• bitteroldcoot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 days ago

    Antarctica is a continent, you can’t send a sub underneath it. Ran discovered previously unseen structures beneath the Dotson Ice Shelf in West Antarctica.

    The Arctic is covered in floating ice, you can send subs under it. Well, it’s covered at the moment, climate change is working on changing all that.

      • Incidion@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        I mean, the definition of a continent is a landmass. We don’t count the ice shelves in Canada or Greenland either.

          • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            They are not part of the continental land mass, even though they are geographically located on the continent called North America. But the Arctic is not a continent because there is no land mass.

              • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                21 days ago

                I don’t see how you are coming to the conclusion that a. that is the meaning of “beneath” in this context and b. how that is a relevant point in this discussion.

                Also, “deliberately” is just a dumb, unfounded accusation. Wtf makes you think people would purposefully misunderstand you in such an irrelevant discussion and that I am acting with that intent in this instance?

              • nomy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                21 days ago

                You’re over here arguing about what continents are and you’re gonna call the other poster obtuse?

  • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Protip: Read the article before you out yourself as a moron for not understanding that they are talking about structural features of melting polar ice.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    That thing looks a bit like a giant red squid.

    Do you think an actual giant red squid would know it wasn’t?

    That device is now at the bottom of the sea after a squid made sweet love to it. 🐙 🦑

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    My theory: companies secretly violating international treaties to extract resources from below the ice floor

  • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    There is no “beneath antartica”. Antarctica is a continent. That would be like “beneath north america”. The best you can do is under one of the ice sheets.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Apparently Antarctica isn’t even contiguous. But most of the time, that means beneath the ice on the border of Antarctica.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Earth.com is, in my experience, ridiculously clickbaity and sensationalist. The open-access article recounting this (that the OP article just regurgitates) is here. (I know this is a memes community; don’t @ me.)

    • zeejoo@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I know this is a meme sub

      Then why did you comment? You know that everyone who saw this meme chuckled, and then either went “probably bullshit” and moved on, or googled it, found out it’s click bait and moved on. You accomplish nothing but giving yourself a soap box.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Then why did you comment?

        Because the OP shared a bad source, some people might want to read about this event (I did, which is why I read this), and this is the original source and open-access. Like goddamn; did the submarine disappear because it went up your ass?

        • zeejoo@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          If you can’t look at that source, read it for 5 seconds and realize it’s a shithole rag of disinformation and conspiracy theories, then you probably should be relying on other people to parse information for you. If you can’t find another source on the same information by using your thumbs, then you may want to get off the internet altogether. OP clearly wasn’t trying to fool anyone or spread disinformation, it’s a meme and you losers are in here demanding a better bibliography.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            If you can’t look at that source, read it for 5 seconds and realize it’s a shithole rag of disinformation and conspiracy theories

            Those people are only going to improve their media literacy when they can compare and contrast what good and bad sources look like – whether they do that on their own or with help from someone else. While that muscle is still underdeveloped in so many people, is it obscene to you to just help them a little?

            If you can’t find another source on the same information by using your thumbs

            Centralizing the information means less wasted work. I’d bet I can do the research you can do in an hour in ten minutes, and my actual decade-long hobby is making research easier for others; I don’t need this lecture.

            demanding a better bibliography.

            “Demanding” is when you just do the thing yourself immediately and unprompted without asking anything from anybody.

              • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                22 days ago

                The comment I was replying to was 89 words. I wrote 116 and only used your quotes to establish what I was replying to. If you consider 116 words a wall of text worthy of ridicule, then I think you’re projecting about who the illiterate morons who shouldn’t be on the Internet are here. You should get off the Internet and pay attention; Mr. Winkler is trying to teach you and the other 4th-graders how to use context clues and what the three-syllable word “demanding” means.

                • zeejoo@thelemmy.club
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  Bro actually counted the words lmfao. Touching grass isn’t enough, you might be a lost cause.