• HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    How is “human cloning” a) a real technology b) a bigger danger than the 8 billion fucking morons already here c) different from twins and triplets?

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We can clone a sheep and even nearly bring species back from extinction via cloning. That is vastly more advanced than just cloning a person, as for the other factors it’s mostly a matter of ethics what with the potential for cloning celebrities for stupid reasons or making a sapient clone just to harvest their organs, which as an aside wasn’t that a Sliders episode?

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        making a sapient clone just to harvest their organs

        A clone just makes a genetically identical baby, though, and they are shorter-lived. Dolly only lived half as long as the sheep she was a clone of, before she died of old age.

        Unless you wanted to wait 15 - 20 years, for organs that might, on average, last 15, cloning isn’t practical.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m assuming we can solve the telemere issue for this. Frankly though it seems to be a stalled out field, at least until we can figure out how to better use stem cells.

          But yeah if you are in your 20s or even 50s making a clone baby of yourself and waiting 20 years would be technically viable to get a new set of organs. Which is more what I’m referring to, especially since creating a healthy body you can rip apart would basically require letting it live a relatively healthy life.