• Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Cool.

    Still sticking with uBlock and SponsorBlock (skips all the “this video was sponsored by” segments on YouTube).

    • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I wish SponsorBlock and DeArrow were integrated into Invidious, like with Piped.

      • Purebred0880@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Freetube has integrated sponsor block (might have to enable it in the settings first). I’ve generally been very happy with the Freetube flatpak, although there have been times when YouTube actively fought against third parties where Freetube did not work for a month.

    • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      SponsorBlock

      I believe uBlock manages to remove all ads on yt by tickling the subscription of some list bundled in its installation already

      • axo10tl@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        12 hours ago

        SponsorBlock skips past the video segments which contain sponsored advertisement. There’s no overlap with what uBlock does.

    • isthereanyseal@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      12 hours ago

      SponsorBlock is not cool. This is the main revenue source of creators.

      Adblock on the other hand in a cancer in youtube and has to go.

          • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            50 minutes ago

            Honey and that one thing that said “oh you can be a Lord if you buy some land in scotland”, among suspicious VPNs and other “problem solvers”.

            If they pay to be spoken off, odds are it’s worth your money.

          • FlordaMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            58 minutes ago

            So many yt’ers promoted honey, that weird Scottish land certificate thing and betterhelp. I would argue all of those are basically scams.

      • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Skipping the sponsored segment doesn’t net the creator less money. They’re paid before the video gets uploaded, or at worst by view count iirc.

            • DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 hours ago

              YouTube knows exactly where you start and stop the video, what segments you skip, etc., etc. and the channel has access to those analytics. Not saying that anyone shares that with the sponsors, but the mechanism IS in place.

              • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                48 minutes ago

                They don’t require it as they already have metrics and data, by the unique promo code from each ad read. That tells them viewers of X will go to the website and buy something.

                But I have never done that, because I don’t buy something because one person I like to watch was paid to talk about it.

              • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Not saying that anyone shares that with the sponsors,

                That’s my point. The sponsors of individual youtubers don’t have access to that information

                • DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  I don’t know anything about sponsor agreements. Just because the sponsors don’t have direct access, that doesn’t mean there aren’t other ways for them to get that information.

                  • zeca@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 hours ago

                    Of course, the creator has an interest to show this data to the advertisers if they have a good audience retention during these sponsored segments. The creators that want to hide this probably can be assumed to have a worse retention… So the advertisers can just ask for the data and know how much money that ad space is worth, and make decent estimates even when the creator refuses to share that data.

                    In the end, that data may very well influence how much the creator receives.

            • JordanZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Have you never seen this when skipping through a video? The spikes are the most watched parts. They absolutely track what individual parts of a video get the most views.

                • zeca@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  The creators sell adventisement space and want the advertisers to know that their channel is a good investment, so the more they can prove to the advertisers that their sponsor segments arent skipped, the more they can charge for it.

              • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Do you have proof it harms them?

                Unless you personally click the link and sign up using code WeAreAScam at checkout, they don’t get anything extra. They already have been paid for the ad read.

                It’s like saying you’re stealing from a TV station because you took a piss during the ad break.