• kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    He wasn’t convicted of the crime of rape because he hasn’t, to date, been criminally charged with rape. He was sued civilly by E. Jean Carroll for sexual abuse and defamation, and found by a jury liable for both acts. Which means the jury found that sufficient evidence existed that he did sexually abuse her even without a criminal conviction for rape.

    The judge later clarified that the acts that the the jury found him liable for, forcible penetration of the vagina with his fingers, do constitute first degree rape under New York law. And first degree rape in New York has no statute of limitations. Were he to be tried for rape, the evidence in the civil suit would be admissible and he would almost certainly be convicted of rape. Weird that hasn’t happened, but here we are.

    So technically, he is not a convicted rapist as he has yet to be criminally charged and tried for rape. But he has also been determined by a court and a jury to have absolutely sexually abused E. Jean Carroll in a manner that constitutes rape under New York law. “Rapist love this one weird loophole.”

    • Snowies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      3 days ago

      He paid her 78 million dollars specifically so that he wouldn’t have to take a DNA test to prove his innocence.

      Hmmmm

      • jve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I missed something. What dna were they going to test that could influence a case for a crime that occurred 30 years ago?

        E. Jean Carroll requested a DNA sample from Donald Trump in 2020 to compare with unidentified male DNA found on the dress she allegedly wore during a 1990s sexual assault.

        Well there you go.

        EDIT: added some googling.