• HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why not both? Other people’s desperation is not an excuse to rob you.

    • m0darn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yeah I’m not excusing the burglars. I’m saying the way to reduce the number of burglars isn’t more police, it’s less desperation.

    • Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Because we live in a universe of finite resources. So maybe be efficient, and do the things that work best first. When we have a budget surplus we can talk about where to spend that.

    • bradbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      More policing creates more criminals, which increases net desperation since society punishes people with a criminal history.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s more effective on a finite budget. Just like focusing on a rehabilitation is better than focusing on punishment in prisons. The Norwegian method spends way more per person but the ones that go through the system are much less likely to come back. This means that per person Norway spends way less than a lot of other countries.

      Norway spends 3x more per prisoner than the US but spend half as much on prisons.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Explanations aren’t excuses. Especially because the things that drive individuals are systems; we can strive to hold individuals accountable for their actions whilst also recognise the systemic oppression that makes it harder to make good choices