• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This is a good thing.

    It more closely mirrors TSMC and Samsung Foundries.

    I know Lemmy largely won’t believe it, but not every molecule of air MAGA breathes is bad. In fact, this feels like a sharp reaction to stubborn neoliberal orthodoxy, hence folks like Bernie are nodding along. I mean, I tend to be more of a deficit hawk, but this is a worthy investment (with the right conditions and stipulations for Intel to not shutter long term projects for short term profit).

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      yeah its the broken clock thing. Still the piece I heard it from said it had not been done since ww2 but I swear in the car bailout we got some sort of equity we eventually sold. Later after sails it made a profit (not taking into account infaltion that I know of)

  • xyzzy@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m against the government cutting a check to a corporation without extracting a direct, concrete benefit to the American taxpayer. So I’m in favor of this.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      this. its great in that this is how all bailouts and such should be but its whose in charge of the implementation that makes it fucked.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    18 hours ago

    According to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, the plan would see the US disbursing approved CHIPS Act grants only after acquiring non-voting shares of Intel and likely other chipmakers. That would allow the US to profit off its investment in chipmakers, Lutnick suggested, and Sanders told Reuters that he agreed American taxpayers could benefit from the potential deals.

    “If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment,” Sanders said.

    The plan is that instead of just giving Intel the public’s money with no strings, the public would get something in return. I have to admit that doesn’t sound awful to me.

    • Gamoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yes. Of course. Because that’s what will happen, that money will go into improving services for the public rather than being funnelled into a rich pricks pockets. Totally what will happen, no reason to doubt that whatsoever.

  • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.”

    — Benito Mussolini

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Fascism is Imperialism turned inwards.

      Fascism is capitalism in decline.

      Both of these quotes get attributed to Lenin but I think only the second is.

      They are essentially equivalent though. Imperialism is a requirement of capitalism and the methods capitalist use to oppress the third world get turned inward on the imperial core. You will see ICE use the same methods the IDF has used in the west bank and Gaza. These were training grounds for Fascist oppression and specifically in methods of crowd control.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    What in the ever living fuck happened to “the free market”?!?!

    Don’t innovate and sell faulty chips which ignite in people’s PCs? Should go out of business. This bail out nonsense is so stupid. Always privatize the gains and socialize the losses in good ol USA.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well this isn’t exactly a bailout per se. The government will own a chunk of Intel, which is pretty much the beginning of what should happen if something is “too big to fail” and needs a bailout: nationalization.

      Now, who the hell knows if this will end up being a good use of tax dollars, but at the very least it’s not a free bailout for fucking billionaires whose milking of the system crashed it.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I wonder what this would mean for competition. Would US adopt rules that are beneficial to Intel to increase their share price?

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      How it may happen: Nvidia and AMD get restrictions on selling to China (already happening, but discussed more in the past weeks before this announcement) and can’t sell their best. Intel may be allowed to sell their newest tech to get a competitive edge which will even the playing field, or Nvidia and AMD can be told if they want an even playing field they must sell portions of their company to the U.S. government as well.

      Want to sell the newest tech, throw in a couple board seats.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Even with all of the bad press recently, they still outsell AMD CPUs by around 2:1. (source)

        It’s bizarre to call them irrelevant when they still completely dominate the sector in sales.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I can see where this may help open the door / set precedent for the country to buy out or into companies long term… but when Intel declared they are basically dead in the water because their tech was at least 5 years behind on research now and in the last 5 years their stock as essentially halved, who can say what it will do other than cushion Intels fall.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Arc is good, just needs a bigger SKU and another generation.

      Intels CPUs are not bad, especially their smaller cores, just sold in stupid overclocked configs. In comparison to AMD, they are are way better than bulldozer was back in the day.

      Fabs are behind TSMC but still close. Compute and graphics APIs are a mess but getting better by the month.

      Intel is on the brink of being fine if they can just stop the footgunning, canceling, dysfunctional delays and corporate Game of Thrones.

  • SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Where’s all the Bernie champs now?

    I’ve had a bad vibe ever since the credit card bill (legislation, not a monthtly fee for anyone who wants to be pedantic).

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Right here, this is fine with me.

      The US was incredibly stupid to not demand shares in the US banks when they had them over a barrel and crapping themselves in 2008 - and instead gave them tens of billions of interest-free loans and literal handouts. Capitalism, right up until the companies that are ‘too big to fail’ go belly-up and fuck the entire world economy with their stupid decisions, then its, “oh can we please have some socialism? No, we will not agree to any public ownership or shares lol … And no there can be no strings attached - wtf we deserve those executive bonuses this year - just give us the money. Thx plebs! Thoughts and prayers for your mortgage”.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I feel a need to clarify: if the plan went as stated, where the US takes a stake in Intel and funnels money back into the federal government to do things the federal government needs to do, I would be completely fine with this.

        More likely, this is a backdoor way to put money in the hands of billionaires.

    • ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Weird to ask about people whereabouts.

      Just in case you didn’t read the article:

      “If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment,” Sanders said.