The problem with playing the fool. Anyone can read me saying:

Here’s my claim: when Liberals are given the choice between giving power to the left or giving power to facists[sic], or even shooting fascists. They choose to give power to the fascists. For evidence I presented an example from recent history.

And

When pushed you not only told me why they gave the gun to the Fascists [the election], but that they should give the gun to the Fascists. [it would be the end of democracy if they didn’t, fascists are famously democratic]

The rest is distraction from those two key points, that you not only do not disagree with the meme [hard sentence to parse, I could have communicated it better, but ChatGPT got it though and that’s an acceptable floor to me] but embody it. The first step to solving a problem is identifying it.

My point was clear and stated many times. You could have read that if you wanted.

I have no idea. Was there a point being argued?

For once something we agree on. Can we just leave it at that? A positive note of agreement between us? For my own part, I’m happily quoting this nonsense at the start of the thread. Here’s the culmination of your position:

What’s a metaphor

And

I have no idea. Was there a point being argued?