More shady shenanigans to come. It was being used to allow the model to move around to hack into systems. To see how far it can go. A Red team test. Red teams ran the tests after Anthropic released Mythos early to major corporations and the government. Red-team exercises typically involve an organization testing its defenses by simulating an attack. In this case, the NSA reportedly used Mythos itself as the tool to probe its classified networks for weaknesses.

  • ZDL@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The key word there is “believe”.

    Until there’s evidence, that’s all you have: a belief.

    • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Ai will become more dangerous. I am telling you, it is not just about believing. It is and it will continue. It will mess up and make people crash cars for example.

      • ZDL@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only danger this round of AI will bear is fiscal. When, not if, the bubble bursts, one country in particular is going to have a really bad year economically speaking.

        The bullshit market hype that Anthropic is putting out about how “dangerous” its “latest model” is … well, it’s exactly that. Market hype.

        • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It isn’t hype if some ai is already causing problems. Examples: Deepfakes, misinformation and cyber security threats. A model was already yanked from the customers.

          • ZDL@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Please, just stop fucking fluffing the techbrodudes, dude. Or carry on. Won’t make a difference to me; I won’t be seeing any of it anymore.

              • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                22 hours ago

                It is wild that people who are supposedly against AI don’t want to believe it is dangerous. Don’t underestimate your enemies. AI is genuinely dangerous, that’s a big part of the reason why I’m against it. That doesn’t mean I think it’s smart, or intelligent, or useful, or any of those things. But it makes people think it is, and that’s genuinely dangerous.

                  • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    21 hours ago

                    I mean, to be fair, Anthropic has been leaning pretty hard on the “ooooh, look at our AI, it’s sooo dangerous *spooky hands* you all need to be afraid of it because of how powerful it is and I’m sure none of you will want to try it when we finally are allowed by the government to release it” OooOooOOOooooOOoo (more spooky ghost noises)

                    I can kind of get why people are kneejerk reacting with “AI is not dangerous that’s marketing garbage” and a lot of that specific bullshit is, but don’t kneejerk so far your leg breaks. AI can absolutely be dangerous. Mythos ain’t necessarily it, but don’t generalize that to all AI, and it doesn’t even need to be powerful to be dangerous.