More shady shenanigans to come. It was being used to allow the model to move around to hack into systems. To see how far it can go. A Red team test. Red teams ran the tests after Anthropic released Mythos early to major corporations and the government. Red-team exercises typically involve an organization testing its defenses by simulating an attack. In this case, the NSA reportedly used Mythos itself as the tool to probe its classified networks for weaknesses.

    • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      You think the government would actually release all of them anyway? Think about what you are saying, the NSA has it. This is the NSA we are talking about.

      • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What?

        I’m saying if the AI model is so good at hacking government systems, why haven’t they obtained the Epstein files?

        Of course the government wouldn’t release them. Bondi even said that if they did the system would collapse from how corrupt they all are. Of course they’d never release it of their own volition, that’s why we’ve got a textbook limited hangout, they’re hoping people will be satisfied with the less disparaging info and forget about what they haven’t released.

        Meanwhile, Mythos is getting close to being replicated on open source

        https://medium.com/open-intelligence/openmythos-the-open-source-reconstruction-of-claude-mythos-that-reframes-what-ai-scaling-actually-32297d4be231

        So my point is, if it’s so good at breaking into government databases, where are the leaks?

        Or is this just a publicity stunt for Anthropic?

        • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What I am saying is, it hasn’t been released. Has it? Let’s see if Mythos actually does. If the government is the only one that has it, they won’t be hacking the Epstein files.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Completely baseless and stupid claim from an admin that lies more often than not. This would be crazy if true though.

      • webadict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Hey buddy… How does AI work? Just, briefly explain how it works so we can verify that you know what you’re talking about.

        • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          That is a broad question… With that question, It looks like you are asking because you don’t know. What kind of ai? If you are talking about ai systems, they learn from huge amounts of data, and it identifies patterns to make predictions or decisions.

          • webadict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Oh, no, I know how these things work generally, but do you? I’ll let you decide if you wanna pick LLMs or Generative AI or Machine Learning. How does any AI “learn”? How does it do anything? How would any of these AI systems hack anything. Just… Walk us all through it. Because if you don’t know how these things work or would work, then I’m not gonna trust your assertions.

            • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              It learns through pattern recognition. Did I say it can do it on its own?! If it looked that way, I was meaning in the future. Ai tools can be used by a user now. A user, not hacking by itself, or on its own.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          There is no “AI”. It’s just a computer program. I imagine it’s largely fuzzing optimized with statistics, methodology, etc. This approach seems legit, although I can only speculate on the efficiency. I guess these grifters have never cared about efficiency, esp when hacking the NSA.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If you think its hacking nearly all NSA systems you’re cooked.

          • kingofras@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Hey look it’s a 5 day old AI evangelist account.

            You clearly don’t understand the technology, which disqualifies you from fear stoking the masses who also dont understand it.

            • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              You clearly don’t know who I am and just assume that I don’t know anything about the tech. Based on a newer account. How tragic. You sound like one of those Reddit bots. Yuck!

              • kingofras@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                You believe AI can hack systems, that’s what i’m basing this on, and your other comments which are all promoting LLMs to be far more than they actually are.

                • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  17 hours ago

                  AI can be used hack systems! I am not saying it will do it by itself. Not yet, unless we get so advanced like in all those movies. And you don’t know what advanced tech is out there, that is not released to the public. You acting all high and mighty, like you know everything about this is fucking disgusting.

              • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                A dipshit LLM isn’t gonna kill anyone directly idk what you’re on about lol

                The terminator is not real

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        23 hours ago

        “Chief claims” - without evidence, this means absolutely nothing. Especially as this was a higher up, who likely heard about something happening through multiple layers of reports.

          • ZDL@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            The key word there is “believe”.

            Until there’s evidence, that’s all you have: a belief.

            • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              Ai will become more dangerous. I am telling you, it is not just about believing. It is and it will continue. It will mess up and make people crash cars for example.

              • ZDL@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                The only danger this round of AI will bear is fiscal. When, not if, the bubble bursts, one country in particular is going to have a really bad year economically speaking.

                The bullshit market hype that Anthropic is putting out about how “dangerous” its “latest model” is … well, it’s exactly that. Market hype.

                • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  It isn’t hype if some ai is already causing problems. Examples: Deepfakes, misinformation and cyber security threats. A model was already yanked from the customers.