And in doing so, I have been accused of being a nazi in this thread, ergo I should apparently be shot and killed.
I came here to escape reddit but I think I made a mistake.
So you see how the OP’s caption didn’t mention anything about mere accusations, and implicitly assumed that the speaker could discern good from evil? And we then had to point out that in practice it’s accusations, not objective fact?
And do you see how the person at the top of this comment chain started at the basis of fundamental human rights, which not include the right to life, but also the right not to be assaulted?
So, the difference you are seeing is not a meaningful one.
It doesn’t have to, but things have been allowed to get too far out of control, the political left have not pushed back enough and now we’ve got people doing nazi salutes out in the open. We are past the point of being able to deal with this to the legal system because the legal system has been co-opted.
I don’t know what people like you want. How do you want this situation resolving because all you ever say is what you don’t want, you don’t want violence, okay fine so how do you want to proceed?
Lmao why do you think there are corpses filling it?
they’re too busy playing by the rules and getting killed with nobody caring, because “we’re better than all that” is a dumb notion that ultimately makes you a pushover that wouldn’t pull the trigger to save 1000 people.
Doesn’t seem like a very unpopular opinion tbh
If you push back on “punch a nazi” you’ll find how unpopular it is quite quickly
Punching nazis is morally correct.
We are pushing back on “kill everyone accused of being a nazi”.
Who the fuck is doing that? Who’s advocating for that? This just some bullshit in your imagination because it sure seems that way.
And in doing so, I have been accused of being a nazi in this thread, ergo I should apparently be shot and killed. I came here to escape reddit but I think I made a mistake.
So you see how the OP’s caption didn’t mention anything about mere accusations, and implicitly assumed that the speaker could discern good from evil? And we then had to point out that in practice it’s accusations, not objective fact?
And do you see how the person at the top of this comment chain started at the basis of fundamental human rights, which not include the right to life, but also the right not to be assaulted?
So, the difference you are seeing is not a meaningful one.
Without context, it isn’t.
As soon as I post it in a thread about Nazis doing Nazi shit, I get downvoted to hell.
Same with my anti-war stance.
Gee, I wonder why
Context is critical though. Often times I see people say things like “we shouldn’t stoop to their levels” which, like yeah, we shouldn’t have to.
The moral high road is filled with corpses.
It doesn’t have to, but things have been allowed to get too far out of control, the political left have not pushed back enough and now we’ve got people doing nazi salutes out in the open. We are past the point of being able to deal with this to the legal system because the legal system has been co-opted.
I don’t know what people like you want. How do you want this situation resolving because all you ever say is what you don’t want, you don’t want violence, okay fine so how do you want to proceed?
Lmao why do you think there are corpses filling it?
they’re too busy playing by the rules and getting killed with nobody caring, because “we’re better than all that” is a dumb notion that ultimately makes you a pushover that wouldn’t pull the trigger to save 1000 people.