• Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yep. Just like how nobody uses Windows since Linux is easily accessible.

    Wait

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Having an option vs not having an option

      Also Linux and Windows are pretty different in use cases and capabilities. Meanwhile, local AI models have a very similar user experience. If hardware was cheaper and people could run better LLMs locally, they wouldn’t pay monthly for it.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You’re right, the general public doesn’t use Linux due to the lack of ability to browse the web and file their taxes—Windows exclusive functionality.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          In the workplace, there are still a lot of domain specific programs that don’t have Linux support. Companies don’t have much of an incentive to port that stuff over. As for the people who just need a web browser, they probably would use Linux just fine if they could buy a computer at BestBuy that comes with Linux preinstalled

          Compare that to LLM programs, where it’s a matter of “download this app instead of that one, because this one is free and that one costs $25 a month”

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The general public adopting open tech themselves instead of using corporate options

        Was that not clear?