• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    214
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The raid is part of a “national security investigation in search of classified records,” a person familiar with the matter told NBC News.

    FBI Director Kash Patel tweeted “NO ONE is above the law… @FBI agents on mission” at around 7 a.m. ET, the same time his agents reportedly arrived at Bolton’s home in Bethesda, near Washington, D.C.

    Then if someone were to be caught with classified records in the bathrooms and poolside storage rooms at Mar a Lago, they’d be facing some serious legal consequences, right? No one is above the law, right, Kash?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s not what they’re looking for…

      The only reason they’d raid Bolton is if they thought he might be holding onto an “insurance policy”, likely Epstein related.

      I think a lot of people who worked around the Epstein shit is gonna start getting raided.

      They want to release their doctored version, and they’re trying to make sure no one has what they’ve redacted before they release it.

      Logically, there aren’t many other reasons for this…

      • FishFace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        85
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Remove tinfoil before opening mouth.

        This is much simpler: Bolton opposed Trump, therefore he is an enemy of Trump, therefore an enemy of the state, therefore a legitimate target for harassment through law enforcement. Same way if in Russia someone opposes Putin he will have goons come after him. It all discourages any kind of opposition, because most opponents will go away if you just trash their house or beat them up a bit.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Exactly. This was sending a message, not to Democrats, but to Traditional Republicans who might be considering opposing the MAGA takeover. There is no Republican Party, it’s the MAGA PARTY now, so get on board, or else!

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s right out of the autocracy handbook. The orange is intimidating and soon getting rid of his opposition one raid at a time. And every raid sends a clear message to his enemies and allies: “Do not oppose the Czar.”

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          You think as much as trump is freaking out about Epstein…

          That he’s just going after random people who aren’t actively causing him problems?

          He’s simple minded, and there’s a lot of pressure to release more info. If he releases something, and says it’s everything, anyone that might have retained information from prior to Joe Biden’s presidency is a threat.

          Bolton could have literal.proof about what the government had prior to Biden, saying that’s the likely motivation isn’t “tinfoil” it’s Occam’s razor.

          • FishFace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago
            1. What makes you think John Bolton would have anything Epstein-related?
            2. What about the many, many other individuals Trump has targeted with the DoJ and other branches of government? Do they all have an Epstein-related “insurance policy” as well?
            3. What makes you think Trump is “freaking out” about Epstein? He has said several things disapproving of the intense interest in Epstein, but that’s not enough to make me think that any time he abuses the government to target his opponents it must be because of that.

            This is like all conspiracy theories: you’ve got a pet idea that would be exciting if it were true and so you’re minded to ignore any alternative explanations for the facts.

            If he releases something, and says it’s everything, anyone that might have retained information from prior to Joe Biden’s presidency is a threat.

            What’s to prevent him from saying they’ve fabricated it?

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 day ago
              1. Because ever since Kissinger the national security advisor has been the conduit between the president and intelligence agencies. And Bolton was in that position when the FBI opened the safe at Epstein’s place. The one filled with video and electronic files that somehow “disappeared”.

              2. If I said a rectangle was a square, would you say that’s only possible if every rectangle was a square?

              3. Reality…

              Now, one question for you:

              1. What about America in 2025 makes you write off every conspiracy as fake? You know there are real life co spiracies every fucking day? Are you expecting people to just give trump the benefit of the fucking doubt that he wouldn’t pull a conspiracy? It hasn’t even been five years since he fucking cnspired to overthrow the USA government resulting in a real life insurrection. But this is too out of pocket for you? You can’t imagine Trump’s administration would do that?

              Come the fuck on…

              If you don’t understand still, nothing else I ever say will help you. Best of luck.

              • FishFace@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Because ever since Kissinger the national security advisor has been the conduit between the president and intelligence agencies. And Bolton was in that position when the FBI opened the safe at Epstein’s place.

                The “conduit”? Correct me if I’m wrong but the National Security Advisor isn’t out kicking in doors when the FBI go on raids. The FBI is not an intelligence agency (it has an intelligence branch) and being the “conduit” doesn’t mean he has the ability, inclination, foresight or skullduggery to gather such “insurance policies.”

                If I said a rectangle was a square, would you say that’s only possible if every rectangle was a square?

                If you said that on a specific day the sun rose because you had prayed really hard for it to pray the previous day, I would be asking you what about all the other days when it rose without your apparent intervention.

                Reality…

                Not good enough.

                What about America in 2025 makes you write off every conspiracy as fake?

                I’m calling out your conspiracy theory thinking. Target John Bolton with an FBI investigation is a conspiracy, is a fascist abuse of power and is not, in any way, giving Trump “the benefit of the doubt.” But it’s not conspiracy theory thinking, because there’s no super secret bullshit that only a select few are smart enough to work out - it’s the regular kind of secret stuff that we can infer based on facts and evidence.

                To believe your story I have to believe that there’s a high chance John Bolton has “the Epstein list” and has kept it as insurance. You have given me no reason to believe this except that Bolton was head of - not the FBI, not the DoJ, but the National Security Council. So what? On the basis of such weak evidence you’d be saying that thousands of government officials have Epstein related “insurance”.

                You’re not, though, because you’re not actually basing this on any thought process which takes evidence into account.

                  • FishFace@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    Why are you joining this comment thread to do something other than offer an actual reason to believe that Bolton has an Epstein-based insurance policy, when this investigation is adequately explained the same way all of Trump’s other retaliatory abuses of power are explained?

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        What would Bolton have had to do with the Epstein materials? He was National Security Advisor.

              • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                I think what he’s saying is that the simpler explanation is that Trump hates people not sucking his dick and regurgitating his bullshit statements. Bolton has been doing the rounds and not following the trump line. So now trump hates him, which means the regime hates him.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”