It’s beast-iality, definitely, but he’s an intelligent adult and can clearly communicate his desires, so it’s closer to xenophilia (meaning actual extraterrestrials, not just humans from other cultures)
Velma is canonically a lesbian in several versions and Shaggy is unironically capable of getting with many women. Seriously Shaggy the chick magnet is canon.
I believe bestiality is wrong, solely because animals can’t consent, and for no other reason. In a hypothetical scenario where the specific animal in question can consent, you still believe bestiality is wrong, so clearly you have another reason. Why? What is that reason?
It’s beast-iality, definitely, but he’s an intelligent adult and can clearly communicate his desires, so it’s closer to xenophilia (meaning actual extraterrestrials, not just humans from other cultures)
Yep. Scooby and Velma totally kosher for the same reason
Put down the peanut butter, and step away from the dog…
Theoretically, sure, but that’s pretty fucked up to do to shaggy
Velma is canonically a lesbian in several versions and Shaggy is unironically capable of getting with many women. Seriously Shaggy the chick magnet is canon.
It’s shaggy and scooby…
Velma and Daphne are together, but that’s an open relationship, so it’s not a problem for Daphne.
Teratophilia actually.
Its anthropomorphic fetishizing of animals. That they would still fuck a dog as long at its human enough, is revolting.
If it can consent, what’s the problem?
The bestiality part.
I believe bestiality is wrong, solely because animals can’t consent, and for no other reason. In a hypothetical scenario where the specific animal in question can consent, you still believe bestiality is wrong, so clearly you have another reason. Why? What is that reason?
And you better not say “because it’s disgusting”
Eek.