• aev_software@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let’s also ban it for teachers who create educational materials. My kids receive and work with such materials and it’s wrong so often and deeply, the teachers can’t even explain how to solve problems.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      South Park satirized the whole AI thing pretty well. I recommend those episodes. I remember all the stories about teachers using AI to grade papers. It reminds me of a teacher I had who claimed to grade papers by throwing them down the stairs and grading based on how far they went!

    • Glide@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      As a teacher, I can’t agree enough. I’m really tired of being handed slop from my coworkers, and then having to weigh the social implications of explaining to them how I know it is slop and why this particular case of slop is bad. The amount of energy I have to spend deconstructing their use of AI, and then translating and validating that deconstruction to them, doesn’t match the effortlessness with which they pump out more slop and leave me frustrated that I have to do this every time.

      Just ban it from use in elementary and secondary schools, please.

    • cokeslutgarbage@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m an adult taking night classes at my local community college. I have two instructors (neither is technically a professor). One is my age, and she begs us not to use AI, as some of my classmates openly talk about using it. My other instructor is in her 60s and all of her assignments have little notes under the header that say “this worksheet was generated by copilot”. It’s baffling. My feedback at the end of the semester is always “this class was great, but I wish the assignments didn’t use AI”.

      • aev_software@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, I’m paying tuition for a human teacher. I’m not paying anything for an AI-generated tutor. If the producer doesn’t value the work, I don’t see why I should.

        • cokeslutgarbage@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I didn’t mean to misrepresent the situation. She inputs all the material herself but uses copilot to format the worksheet, including the addition of emojis and clip art, and AI generated images all over the online class forum. She’s very involved with the students’ work and is a fountain of knowledge during classes, which makes her completely unnecessary use of AI so terribly confusing.

      • 7101334@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Go on ratemyprofessor and give her a low score. That actually does influence professors imo.

        • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Teacher here, it doesn’t. There is a strong bias on this kind of site towards negative reviews so we tend to ignore it as a. it doesn’t represent reality and b. we want to keep our mental health.

          • 7101334@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s been like half a decade (fuck, old) since I was in college but I never felt it had a particularly negative slant. Most good professors had very good ratings, the one actually-bad professor I took had a pretty bad rating (but she was the only one available for that class).

            I always used it when signing up for classes, so even if it doesn’t influence individual educators, it’ll tell you who to avoid. Especially for valid critiques like “fills her lessons with AI slop”.