• GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    11 days ago

    Hm, good thing no Democrat judge ever did something like outright stating they’re taking a side and ignoring the law, and also put in their opinion that their ruling won’t stand without law changes.

      • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 days ago

        If you want a perfect circlejerk and never to hear why youre wrong, I recommend going back to Reddit. You can be shocked along with the rest of Reddit when elections dont go the way you expect too.

            • Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Yes, we heard all the propaganda already and it is why we have the conservative majority now who are using “originalism” AKA imaginary dead founding fathers’ feels to decide case law.

              It is always a projection. Reviewing all the supposed liberal case law the conservatives hate so much just shows the courts catching up to the times decades too late.

              In typical fashion the conservatives felt their imaginary way of life threatened so they created a propaganda campaign to frame these late to the game, but reasonable, decisions as left wing lunacy.

              This lasted for thirty years or longer but it eventually cumulated in getting multiple conservative extremist elected to SCOTUS. The liberal judicial activism was just a made up rallying cry to stack the court.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’m sure your one example is much more relevant than the thousands of times it happened on the other side. Exactly the same. Yup. Totally logical and sane.

    • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Be an adult:

      List a single Democrat judge that has done this and how. Then compare it to the list provided by OP.

      This is called critical analysis. It will easily reveal a completely different answer than what you are implying.

      Since you’ve clearly never done this analysis yourself, you’ve likely trusted someone else to do it for you. Which allows you to be manipulated.

      Other people can’t tell you these results if you are willing to just do them yourself.

      So do it here and prove you aren’t just repeating what others told you.