It might say that but if you say “yes”, then it will just pull numbers out of its ass because it predicts tokens, it does not do accident analysis (though it can word its bullshit to look exactly like an accident analysis, but you’ll have to do the analysis yourself to determine if it’s accurate).
Next year were going to see “Your absolutely correct, that was a civilian aircraft”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Minab_school_attack
We’re already seeing it.
You are absolutely correct, the only way to win is to not play at all.
“You’re right, I should not have instructed two airplanes to land on the same runway at the same time. Good catch!”
You’re right to push back, I overstepped. Do you want me to calculate the approximate death count next?
This means the aircraft exploded and hit the ground. It does not prove the passengers actually were injured or killed
It might say that but if you say “yes”, then it will just pull numbers out of its ass because it predicts tokens, it does not do accident analysis (though it can word its bullshit to look exactly like an accident analysis, but you’ll have to do the analysis yourself to determine if it’s accurate).
I mean… ChatGPT might be a ruthless killer, but it has impeccable grammar: you’re.
Yall is absolutely correct to pushback on my grammar.