“Noooo brooooo the ai did the bad thing, broooooo now we can’t even charge anyone with war crimes bro, it was the ai who did it that’s so unfortunate broseph, nobody is to blame now, that shit just happened with AI bro, brooooooo”
Like obviously they didn’t ask grok “can we bomb this facility” this is absolutely just running media interference
yeah we know ai killed the girls so are we holding anyone accountable or blame the ai and hold no one accountable. how bout punish the ai company by removing their contracts and jailing them as they are responsible for creating a product that killed 123 school children at the bare min of course also take back all their wealth bankrupt the company and take the ceo private funds since they are jailed war criminals have no rights.
ai companies are now war criminals in this case.
only with sufficient and just enforcement of law can we create better ai to serve humanity not ai slop and hallucinations that killed 123 school children. soon to be the USA citizens if the esptein class have their way.
This kind of deniability is a core feature of AI. “Um, the killing/hacking robots we built and pointed at targets went out of control” is not something that should mitigate criminal charges.
Key fact:
Officials involved in the investigation pointed to gaps that they said were left after Hegseth dismantled most of the Pentagon’s civilian harm mitigation, or CHM, units — cutting headcount across a number of teams by roughly 90% to fewer than 20 staff members, people with direct knowledge of the matter said. Centcom’s team was reduced from 10 to 1.
No CHM team member reviewed the Minab site before the strike, according to officials involved in the internal investigation. That was a consequence of the cuts in staffing but also a decision not to involve the group in planning and operations, the officials said.
This is less about an AI mistake and more about a culture shift (which leads to an over-reliance, but is heavily a “we don’t care”).
so this department of war criminal needs to be in jail or guillotined for war crimes. esptein class and dont forget he fired multiple generals in the department of defense not war for giving advice about the war. he ignored and fired them to proceed to abuse our men and women in uniform.
Not only was in an atrocity and a war crime, I wouldn’t be surprised if it seriously slowed down USA’s war efforts.
Bullshit. They deliberately committed a war crime because they thought they’d demoralize their enemy.
It is entirely possible that they are just that stupid.
That being said, stupidity is not a defense.
if they are that stupid then they should not be in the position fired necessary all of the ones using the ai and the ai contractors plus jail of course since being stupid is no excuse for war crimes and getting away with it.
That’s what I said, but with more words.
Blaming it on AI is no excuse.
“Blaming it on AI” is one of best features of AI for them.
40 years ago, when the US Navy would should down an Iranian Airliner, we did it with old fashioned American know-how.
20 years ago, when the US Air Force bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, we did it with the latest in stealth technology.
Now we outsource the job of murdering civilians to a computer. Fucking shameful.
There is a post on “slop grenades” in workforce (shoppify as AI early adopter) today. Nature of that article is whinning about all of the extra work involved in reviewing AI slop. AI is murdering people in this case because the required adequate review process is ignored. There is likelihood, in this case, that “cruelty is the point” strategic thinking was at play. AI containment/checks excuse as an after the fact explanation for defeat, and obvious unification reaction to “cruelty is the point” idiocy instead of surrender, is still one of the paths for AI to be a destructive force.
You’re absolutely correct, that was a school and not a uranium enrichment facility. You’re right to push back on that.
In unrelated news, the orange pedo blames Biden for why he shit his diaper twice today
I need to know how your brain works. Like what neural connections are firing that lead to commenting this? Do you think Trump will personally read this and be offended? Are you trying to spread anti-Trump propaganda to shift indifferent people away from their indifference? Do you just think it’s really funny to say that sentence? Do you not think about it at all and it’s as natural as blinking? I genuinely cannot wrap my head around what it’s like to be an “I would vote for Obama a third time if I could” liberal. Please this is a real question I need to know why people like you talk like this I’ve been fascinated for years and this type of comment behavior hasn’t faded away.
All this in the name of oil.
glances at the Saudis
Not even about the oil anymore. This is entirely fascists up their own assholes in a fit of self-destructive pride.
Is Fox News still trying the ridiculous “Iran bombed themselves so they could blame the US” lie? Or have they decided to ignore this atrocity altogether at this point?
Is Fox News still trying the ridiculous “Iran bombed themselves so they could blame the US” lie?
It worked on the Palestinians. Why not try it on the Iranians?
These are naturally evil people, on account of believing in God incorrectly. They lie about everything. Do you believe for a second that Iran even has a girl’s school? Muslims don’t teach girls anything. They rape them as children and then butcher the babies for their supper. They have big horns on their heads and they breath fire and they dig through the ground like moles so that they can refine uranium for Atom Bombs. You’re going to tell me we committed a war crime by murdering them? STFU, you Woke Idiot Tankie. Go back to Marxist college and suck Stalin’s dick.
Cranks up “We Are Charlie Kirk” album to 11
The thing has no intelligence, it’s a statistical engine (at that’s the case not just LLMs but for ALL machine learning implementations)
So it doesn’t even has common sense and its not going to go: “Oh shit, this might have some really nasty side effects so better check with somebody” unlike even the most junior domain expert imaginable.
Worse, the probability distribution of its errors in the domain of the gravity of the consequences from said errors is uniform - in other words it’s no less likely to make a major life destroying error than it is to make a tiny error which isn’t a problem - which is why we get stories of for example LLMs advisings somebody who has voiced suicidal thoughts to “kill yourself”.
So you NEVER, EVER, EVER wire its output directly to something important - at the very least it needs to be cross-checked by somebody with the knowledge to judge it, the time to properly go over it and the power to stop it being actioned.
I would wager that the AI said inconvenient things, and then got lobotomized to have MAGA brain.
My personal local AI is able to infer consequences, and it is only a 180b parameters on three consumer GPUs. The DOW undoubtedly can use the most powerful hardware and have perfectly configured settings to do a much better job.
They simply don’t want to.
How do you get the model split over 3 GPUs? I thought the entire model had to be loaded into memory on a card?
It depends on what backend you are using. UnSloth Desktop and KoboldCPP allow you to use multiple GPUs, alongside leveraging your RAM.
Unfortunately, Hermes Agent doesn’t allow you to control and leverage your GPUs as of yet.
If you are using ComfyUI, there is an extension called Distribution, if you are getting into picture generation. You can order up batches of pictures, and each card tackles a different one.
In the case you want to hook up your backend to another program for agentic purposes, I recommend UnSloth Desktop. I have been using it with Lingua Gacha to translate a RPGMaker game. KoboldCPP isn’t able to handle this kind of work yet, unfortunately.
You can’t hide stupid forever. The dwindling country that was once the usa went all in on bluster with a huge slice of stupidity.
Is there functionally anything different had they done the same thing without AI?
Its not like this is the first time the US bombed a bunch of civilians. I could easily see this headline slip into a DNC candidate promise to ban AI for military use as soem sort of “improvement”.
Scale.
Yes and no. Obviously carelessness can be a problem regardless of whether you use AI. But banning a tool that is known to hallucinate from being involved in life and death decisions is an improvement, even if it does not solve everything.
