Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Greentext@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-215 days agoAnon is unaware he's at risk for a heart attackslrpnk.netimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageAnon is unaware he's at risk for a heart attackslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Greentext@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-215 days agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-215 days agoLooking past the obvious WTF, dude ain’t curious about his deceased brother(s)? 🤔
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·15 days agoI’ve reread it and don’t see where it says anything about siblings, alive or dead?
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·15 days ago“Written will says most of it is to go to his living son” Try to read first, it’s right there in the post.
minus-square[object Object]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 days agouj/ The son in question is anon
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·15 days agoYes, but there wouldn’t be a reason to say living son unless there was a deceased sibling. The wording implies one or more deaths.
minus-squareidiomaddict@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·15 days agoLegal documents tend to just specify things like that as a matter of course. Boilerplate is easier to adapt than starting from scratch every time.
Looking past the obvious WTF, dude ain’t curious about his deceased brother(s)? 🤔
I’ve reread it and don’t see where it says anything about siblings, alive or dead?
“Written will says most of it is to go to his living son”
Try to read first, it’s right there in the post.
uj/ The son in question is anon
Yes, but there wouldn’t be a reason to say living son unless there was a deceased sibling. The wording implies one or more deaths.
Legal documents tend to just specify things like that as a matter of course. Boilerplate is easier to adapt than starting from scratch every time.