• bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I am saying we already know they are all spying. So while this humour might not quite fit, it’s still just one step removed.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        All the cumulative information just got fed into LLM models through data brokers that have a record of everything you every said, combined with everything else. So, not really meh, so much as an existential risk, as LLM’s are not AI and won’t stop failing, can be used for repression quite well if not entirely accurately.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          “meh” to the sentiment that a meme/message/whatever doesn’t need to be accurate as long as you agree with the sentiment. Lots of people believe a lot of utter lies because of that attitude.

          • bedwyr@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            But it is kind of spying, they are sharing it with 1,300 paying clients. That can then do whatever with it.

            Do they spy more elsewhere? Yes, does that mean this isn’t spying, not necessarily. I don’t think you made the case for why this doesn’t qualify either.

            • FishFace@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Detecting that your client failed to load an ad, and displaying a message attributing that to an ad-blocker, is not, in my book, anything like “spying”. What else the website gets up to is not relevant to whether that is spying, which is what the original post said.