• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Don’t tell anyone but I once took a seed of a palm tree off the ground in public park and planted it. It’s been growing in a pot for a couple of years now.

  • Waterpumpee@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Another idea is to build communities to propagate plants (regardless how they were acquired) and share them (nearly) free of charge.

  • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Stripping them off plants, yeah thats just damaging the plant itself and is shitty behaviour.

    Off the ground? Now its crossing from damage into being pedantic about stuff that would go into a mulcher.

    And I highly doubt that those with the patience and skill to propogate make up any significant margin whatsoever.

    • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s the same sort of business owners who would throw away uneaten food in restaurants and not allow employees to take it home.

      • nullspace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s different because it’s a liability thing. Some asshole would sue over bad food which means nobody gets the food.

        • balsoft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          They could donate the food to a food bank and be completely shielded from liability by Good Samaritan Act

          They don’t want to because it means that poor people can eat for free (gasp) which might slightly impact the restaurant industry and indirectly reduce their profit margin by 0.1%

        • WizardOfFrobozz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Americans would rather chuck perfectly good food into a dumpster than entertain the possibility of summoning the collective fucking will to fix a VERY straightforward problem. The idea that they could just legislate some reasonable liability protections and make sure edible food gets to hungry people apparently requires a level of imagination and civic competence beyond anyone’s wildest dream. So much easier to blame “some asshole” for creating what is surely an insurmountable legal paradox. The food rots, needy people go hungry, and the US gets to pretend the problem is some unavoidable fact of life rather than admit they just couldn’t be arsed to try.

          • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Most stabilized countries have laws in place for food and protections for donations.

            I’m guessing there’s rules behind this one but in the US:

            The Food Donation Improvement Act: This act expands those protections. It allows qualified businesses (like restaurants, supermarkets, and schools) to donate food directly to individuals in need rather than having to route it through a registered 501©(3) nonprofit intermediary. It also allows nonprofits to charge a nominal “Good Samaritan” fee just to cover the logistics and handling costs of distributing the food.

            I don’t know the specifics of that one though.

            • left_is_best@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 minutes ago

              Easier & cheaper to just throw it away, so most businesses probably don’t bother. We would need to mandate and/or subsidize this behavior if we wanted people to actually do it.

    • snoons@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 hours ago

      In my limited experience (I found a succulent leaf on the street) the only skill one would need is to remind themselves to water it, like once a week maybe. All you have to do is drop it into a pot with some soil and water it every now and then. Maybe some succulents are more finicky though. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      *Also, it’s pretty cool to watch. Like the original leaf slowly shrinks and dries out as the new leaves are formed.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I have succulents on my balcony that outgrow their pots. I break off chunks long enough to have a few root-hairs attached and drop them into the scruffy area at the side of the building. They can’t really root themselves there unless we get a bunch of rain, but I’ve seen a few people take one and it always makes me happy.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Funny enough though if they’re snipping a cutting off of the plant to propagate, the plant must be healthy enough to purchase…

  • jambudz@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure the store the original post was from put that up to get people to propagate iirc

  • CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Plucking is wrong anywhere. Taking fallen off props at an independent nursery? Only of theyre cool with it. Big box store? Have at it

  • Ariselas@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Let me guess buying a plant, taking it home, taking a few clippings once it’s healthy and giving them away is also theft like torrents.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      In some cases, it can be. Certain varieties are protected by intellectual property law and whoever owns the rights to it (probably Monsanto, tbh) can sue you if you propagate and distribute unauthorized copies.

      What a shitty, fucked up world we live in…

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s almost like AI, wrt responsibility. Some seeds blow over to another farmer’s field and start to grow, suddenly that farmer can have a ton of problems, through no fault of his own.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Like everything, it depends upon the country and the IP protection sought. Even in the U.S. with the most stupid IP laws, the standard PVP (plant variety protection) has what is called breeders rights. This allows a breeder or researcher to use the genetics for research or development of other products. In most countries around the world this is the only type of IP available.

      In the U.S. every so often a dickhead gets a utility patent on a variety or inbred. This has fallen out of practice for any variety sold internationally as the patent is not respected once the plants cross the border. Instead they patent GMO or mutagenic traits. Since these can be inventions, they are usually protected internationally.

      • insanemantis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        This was a communication teacher who demonstrated to her students how you can get a bunch of people to start thinking about anything by having enough crashouts over it

        No one was thinking about pomegranates until she screamed NO POMEGRANATES and now everyone’s gonna want to bring them to school because of that