• Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
    4·
    26 minutes ago

    Please fuck yes.

    That should also happen to every single AI booster or any person that used AI for profit, and even for any person that used it “recreatively”, because they are complicit in all the environmental, economic, human, and animal harm that AI, and the people behind it, have caused.

    The retaliation must be relentless and merciless, because that is exactly how those bastards were.

  • bold_omi@lemmy.today
    4·
    2 hours ago

    Here’s a transcript:

    nixCraft@mastodon.social: The tweet that crashed NASDAQ and AI stocks in the US and Asia. Lmao. I say bring on aggressive regulations for this AI bullshit. The first step must be forcing them to prove they obtained explicit permission for every single word, code and image they stole from others. We need to claw back every single penny from Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic and the rest who stole data to train their shitty AI. They were so happy so see job losses and acting like brats. Fuck all of them

    Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari: Top of the Democratic agenda on day 1 needs to be a pause on advanced AI development, regulation of this out of control industry, and a ban on artificial superintelligence.

  • Hackworth@piefed.caEnglish
    11·
    3 hours ago

    I’d rather see regulations on how data centers are made, powered, cooled, and maintained. The IP stuff is only an issue because copyright is wielded against individuals and small business by organizations that regularly flaunt the rules. Copyright needs a complete restructuring and has at least since Disney completely fucked it 50 years ago.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      7·
      2 hours ago

      Yup. Universal studios got control of Udio through a lawsuit and the only thing they did was slap copyrights on anything generated and stop you from downloading songs on free accounts. No one making the music used to train it got paid.

      These copyright companies want to own it so it benefits shareholders. On top of that, putting a huge entry price on making a “legal” model suits big AI companies just fine since it kills open source models for business use.

      It’s hard to watch. Everyone is being manipulated into bootlicking the copyright industry.

  • warm@kbin.earth
    50·
    5 hours ago

    It has got to be banned in educational settings as soon as possible. Then start drafting regulations for it as a whole.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    351·
    5 hours ago

    Ok, but did they have to use Trump’s “superintelligence” pet word in a sentence?

    • ryper@lemmy.caEnglish
      7·
      2 hours ago

      That’s not what they did. “Artificial Superintelligence” is something the AI executives have been talking about. “Super Intelligence” is Trump’s term for Artificial Intelligence because somehow an LLM appearing to be intelligent makes it not “artificial” in his mind.

    • MalReynolds@piefed.socialEnglish
      1·
      1 hour ago

      ASI (artificial super [as in beyond human] intelligence) has been a research (and SciFi) topic for decades. Check out 'Person of Interest’for an easily accessible and somewhat prescient (in places) version.

      The tech bros redefined the language to their advantage. LLMs barely pass the Turing test (but they do, in certain circumstances, where predicting the next word works)

      Cheeto in Chief has no clue and a criminally uneducated populace (democracy requires education), even first pat the post.

      Actual ASI is probably at least one and likely a few significant AI theory advancements away (but not that many years), and then it can self improve, which is the scary thing. The last thing we want is psycho/sociopaths in guiding that transition.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      24·
      5 hours ago

      I think the bigger problem is them using the fascist echo chamber, Twitter.

    • Anachu@leminal.space
      5·
      4 hours ago

      I thought “artificial superintelligence” (ASI) is just another way to say AGI, rather than specifically Trump’s forced buzzword.

      • nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world
        6·
        4 hours ago

        It’s actually 3 things: agi is “like an average human”, asi is the self improving entity that is basically a god, and there’s normal ai (different kinds, most people only know LLMs/genai). Trump was so enamoured by the chatbot that he thinks it is super intelligent, hence the si.

        • shalafi@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          59 minutes ago

          I don’t think Trump loves AI, his dementia heard, “People don’t like artificial intelligence.”

          “I’ll demand the word be changed! I am, after all, a marketing genius!”

  • James R Kirk@startrek.websiteEnglish
    25·
    5 hours ago

    This tweet did nothing. The “AI” “industry” has always been a house of cards with none of the major players (outside of the chipmakers) coming anywhere near profitablity. This correction was overdue, investors were just looking for a sign and some are just using the excuse of democrats to finally get out.