Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has accused establishment Democrats of treating her “like shit” as progressive activists urged her to run for president in 2028.

In a 100-minute long video posted on Instagram, the 37-year-old congresswoman from New York said that the party had a “remarkable opportunity” to pass left-wing policies after the midterm elections. She also accused the party’s leadership of starving funds from left-wing candidates during the campaign.

“There’s this huge conversation about candidates that were under invested in,” Ocasio-Cortez said. She cited Angie Nixon, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America who came within 240,000 votes of flipping Florida from red to blue, but ultimately lost to the Republican candidate Ashley Moody.

“If Angie Nixon had just had a little bit of that support, that outcome could have changed. But that money has to come from somewhere and it comes from these people,” Ocasio-Cortez said in reference to the party’s Senate leadership.

Reflecting on the period after she was first elected to Congress in 2018 at the age of 29, Ocasio-Cortez accused senior Democrats of being “horrifically cruel” to her. “I mean I was treated like shit,” she said. “Everybody took a swing at me.”

The Bronx congresswoman is seen as the likeliest progressive candidate to run for the Democratic nomination for president in 2028.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      He’s a standard corporate Dem that looks out for oligarchs before working people. He recently opposed the ballot measure that would have put a one-time wealth tax on billionaires.

    • Triasha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      He is a snake that adopts progressive policies when it suits him, then drops them when the political winds shift if when they threaten capital. He opposed the cali wealth tax. Hes thrown trans kids under the bus retorically.

      Newsom has done good things. He was the mayor of San fransisco in like 2002 that issued marriage licenses to gay couples before it was popular or even legal. But he is not our friend and he doesn’t seem to have principled beliefs, just political instincts.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Who is “us”? Friend of whom? We’re not a monolith.

        And I hear what you’re saying, but it’s all hearsay to me. I’ve watched his politicking and he’s fighting the good fight, I think. And I’m afraid people are so hypersensitive now that they will interpret anything he does as anti-“them” and just refuse to vote, giving the republicans a very easy fight because nobody is voting.

        That’s the plight of a two party state. But if you have something you think particularly he did wrong or was unforgivable, give me the source and I will read up on it and see what it’s about, because I have so far, and I can see what is maneuver and what is a semblance of idealism.

        • Triasha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Newsom is better than any Republican, and it’s not close. There is always a better and worse decision. My critiques of Newsom are about his character relative to other options in the party.

      • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        And everyone not in the 0.1%

        Not to minimize what he did to us, but to show he’s not only problematic for trans people.

          • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            It’s the only thing that comes to your mind, though, and that’s a pretty big issue. That’s single issue shit, like 2A shit or something. You expect solidarity, but you’re not willing to give it.

              • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                And you have nothing more to say about that I bet.

                I know. That’s how most of you just shut down discussion.

                I’ve seen it too many fucking times and it gets tiring. Shape up. Get your arguments in order or nobody will ever take you serious. Just like nobody takes you seriously now.

                Or is the victimhood the point?

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I mean that’s the same single issue shit that the Republicans do with the 2A. What’s the difference? “He’s not 100% perfect, therefore I will refuse to vote for him and let Republicans take a seat that will for sure be worse for my cause”

          It’s Palestine all over again

          • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            We just mentioned two issues. There are plenty more. You didn’t even ask. You can love the corporate, pro-genocide, anti-trans, wealth protecting guy if you want.

            I think that’s closer to maga than my viewpoint. But I understand that we’re easier targets than they are, and you’re really feeling yourself right now

            Bonus points for calling my safety a political issue.

    • someone@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fighting against a billionaire’s tax, hating on trans people, and sleeping with your best friend’s wife? Count me out! If he’s the candidate, I wouldn’t vote for him.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Listen, I only know what I know from what I see from abroad. Could you provide some links or verification for what you say? Because I read a lot of US news, but it’s a bit much to keep track of, so, for me, from what I’ve read in actual articles, I’ve been on his side for a lot of the more controversial topics, because he’s had some 50/50 decisions, like that one thing with trans…

        So the bill was like, you allow gender affirming care AND allow other states to extradite citizens from California from seeking GAC in Ca if they come there specifically for that reason.

        Which is extremely fucked up. It’s pork barrelling, as far as I see it, and I think Newsom catches a lot of flak from the queer crowd even though his decisions protect them from nazi state interference…

        I’d love to hear your thoughts on that.

        • someone@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          What? Really? That allowed other states to extradite those in the state specifically for GAC?

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        How is he doing that? You got a bill or something he voted against? Because I hear a lot of criticism but not a lot of sources.

        Please don’t “google it bro” me, please. I want to know exactly what you guys have a problem with and I have for some time and I never hear anything concrete.

        Please mind, I’m not from the USA, I try to keep up as best I can, but from my point of view he has some pretty sensible politics.