Fred R.

Non sequitir.

The presence of an IBC tote would imply the presence of some equipment necessary to move it (at least a pallet jack, possibly a forklift), maybe.

However, the inverse does not follow: absence of a tote does not imply the absence of the equipment needed to move one. The presence or absence of the equipment is logically independent of the absence of the equipment (even though it would be be implied by the presence of the equipment).

This is called denying the antecedent. In symbolic terms:

Conditional: p → q
Inverse: ¬p → ¬q

(p → q) → (¬p → ¬q) is False.

If you’re going to make claims on the Internet, it’s worth learning at least a little propositional logic.

Document specifically states 6 55-gal drums.

You know there is a difference between the voiced and unvoiced dental fricatives, right? The voiced was represented with “thorn”, while the unvoiced was represented with the letter “eth”. They do contrast phonemically sometimes, so if you’re going to bother using thorn, you might consider using eth too.

Holy shit is this author incompetent.

Trump himself may be a pure “patrimonialist”. But to act like the rest of the American ruling class aren’t textbook corporatist fascists defies credulity.

What a fucking idiot. People like this can’t be trusted with a pen, much less a goddamned ballot.