• rainwall@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not for decades. Only very, very recently have they gotten any appreciable press because Trumps admin fucked this up so badly.

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Because it was frequently in the press? There’s no shortage of links to news reports & stories in the wikipedia articles on the victims, cases, topics.

              • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Because the reporters did their job? You know these reports started before social media was mainstream, right?

                  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 hours ago

                    You can read up, can’t you? I didn’t claim

                    billionaire media owners will [gag victims from exercising their freedom of speech], mostly

                    So, I’m asking how that (apparent counterfactual) works. Does it withstand scrutiny?