The United States is a global superpower, and its military trains for war in every domain. During my years as a military educator, I saw American officers wrestle with any number of scenarios designed to challenge their thinking and force them to adapt to surprises. One case we never considered, however, was how to betray and attack our own allies. We did not ask what to do if the president becomes a threatening megalomaniac who tells one of our oldest friends, Norway, that because the Nobel Committee in Oslo refuses to give him a trophy, he no longer feels “an obligation to think purely of Peace” and can instead turn his mind toward planning to wage war against NATO.

As my colleague Anne Applebaum wrote today, Donald Trump’s threatening message to the Norwegian prime minister should, in any responsible democracy, force the rest of the U.S. political system to act to control him. The president is talking about an invasion that would require “citizens of a treaty ally,” as she put it, “to become American against their will,” all because he “now genuinely lives in a different reality.” And yet neither Congress nor the sycophants in the White House seem willing to stop him.

*🎁 link

MBFC
Archive

  • CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 hours ago

    General: today, we’re doing planning for invading Greenland. I know everyone hates it and it’s a waste of time, but the Commander-in-Chief has ordered it. Admiral, can you get us started?

    Admiral: invading Greenland would be an illegal order, and we are required to ignore illegal orders. We would deploy 400,000 gallons of hot chocolate and instruct our soldiers to get out their comfy slippers and watch Heated Rivalry.

    General: And that successfully concludes our planning exercise for invading Greenland. I’ll see you all on the golf course.

    • xorollo@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Let’s put on our risk management hats to ensure there is nobody getting sick from the huge quantity of milk required to be kept within a narrow temperature range in order to fully supply the hot chocolate. We need some logistic support.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You dont have to obey illegal orders.

    In fact, UCMJ makes it quite clear: you have to refuse them.

    • swade2569@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What’s the illegal order then? Is it illegal to attack an ally because you want something they have? There probably isn’t a law against that specifically, and if there is, how are service members going to know that?

        • swade2569@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That is true but he didn’t declare war so he didn’t break the law. I WISH that we’re breaking the law but the fact is Congress has abdicated that responsibility and there is precedent to support the executive killing people with the use of the military.

          We need Congress to stand up for itself and revoke the ability to abuse the use of the armed forces, by making laws that have consequences and enforce those consequences on any executive who breaks them, even if they’re in the majority’s party.

      • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The terms of the Treaty of the Danish West Indies involves the US giving up all claims and intents on the island of Greenland as part of the deal that saw the US gain the Virgin Islands.

        So there is a 109ish year old law.

        • swade2569@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I only wish treaties were upheld as laws are but we have a long history of treaties being broken and no trial took place other than a trial of arms. If only we had an international court, unanimously agreed upon by the nations of the world.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          One of the core reasons I’m positive the US is irredeemably cooked is that “liberals” continue to believe that the rule of law applies to a fascist oligarchy who has ignored and violated the greatest laws of the land; not just recently, but for most of their lives.

          The 50+ year corporate-fascist-alliance coup is in it’s final hours, yet still. Remember, the Democrats didn’t release the Epstein files either, because they’re financed by the same sociopathic/psychopathic pedophile elite.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Someone asked for an illegal order, one was provided and you didn’t read the context and instead pretended people think the rules existing means they cannot be broken.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        take your pick:

        • deployment to Minneapolis (under what trump himself has called an invasion.) (don’t believe his lies. the only unrest here is brought by federal agents violating the shit out of our rights.)

        • initiating what is certainly an act of war in Venezuela.

        • Same for Denmark should that happen.

        • using the military to engage civilian ships in Venezuelan waters with lethal force rather than using the cost guard for police actions.

        Also to your specific example, yes, it is. Constitutionally, the president is not allowed to initiate wars without approval by congress. This has been pissed away for longer than I’ve been alive, using ‘authorizations’ but it’s still largely there. (Korea, Vietnam. Iraq/Afghanistan, etc.) the only currently still active war authorization is related to the 2002 authorization meant to go after the people behind 9/11, and any attempt to link that to Venezuela is going to be a lie. (never mind Greenland and the rest of NATO.)

        • swade2569@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Congress has largely looked the other way for some 50 years as far as war powers go (along with a lot more of its exclusive power). Worse yet while there is text to say that the executive will execute the laws created by congress, they largely pick and choose the laws they enforce and to what degree, which is constantly ignored (especially when the executive and majority in congress share the same party).

          We now have a situation where the executive sees how loose the responsibility and accountability congress wields, and now decides to violate the norms and there no standard for congress to follow. Congress all seem to be looking at each other shrugging, while rank and file military see nothing in a future of pain and loss for standing up to do the right thing because ultimately nobody has thier backs.

        • Kirp123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 hours ago

          using the military to engage civilian ships in Venezuelan waters with lethal force rather than using the cost guard for police actions.

          So that’s illegal but the soldiers followed those orders and killed civilians. I don’t see how that’s a good look for what’s coming up.

    • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      From the article:

      “The U.S. military is obligated by law, and by every tradition of American decency, to refuse to follow illegal orders. But what about orders that may not be illegal but are clearly immoral and illogical?…”

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Dishonorable discharge and/or military prison is pretty impossible to come back from in a socioeconomic sense. These people have entire families relying in them. It’s either follow orders, or ruin their family. And if you can sit there and wave that off, you lived a charmed life in comparison.

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        if you are dishonorably discharged for ignoring an illegal order, you are not actually dishonorably discharged.

        also: the real solution here is to provide both exit support for those who realize joining was fucking stupid and to convince those who think about joining that they should absolutely not join.

        anyone who stays in, or joins (VOLUNTEERS!) fully knowing what the US does these days, is a fucking piece of utter shit trash.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Please don’t be so ignorant. It’s never that black and white. And if you are dishonorably discharged, nothing they say will make that stigma go away.

          High horses don’t matter when the bill collectors and repo men come knocking.

          People joining today, maybe. But there are people who joined before this stupid shit went down. And they probably joined as a last resort because they felt they had no other choice. That happens. Not everyone is blessed with options.

          • flandish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            ergo the support for those in and wanting to get out.

            those in who want to stay in can go fuck themselves.

            • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Please stop acting high and mighty for shit you know nothing about. The military is not some at-will job you can just up and quit. It doesn’t work that way.

              • flandish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                anyone in currently joined as a volunteer. anyone who stays because they want to is a fucking piece of shit. anyone who is actively researching legal support to get out is doing the right thing.

                the math is not that hard. do you not understand? those who want to be there are fucking pieces of shit.