Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agonot hard rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square279linkfedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down14
arrow-up190arrow-down1imagenot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square279linkfedilink
minus-squareWildly_Utilize@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·16 hours agoIsn’t all the water below the surface layer covered with a liquid?
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·15 hours agoI can’t think of a compelling reason to treat the water on the surface as a distinct entity, though.
Isn’t all the water below the surface layer covered with a liquid?
I can’t think of a compelling reason to treat the water on the surface as a distinct entity, though.