Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agonot hard rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square279linkfedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down14
arrow-up190arrow-down1imagenot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square279linkfedilink
minus-squareKombatWombat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours agoI would say this still works. Assuming we are not compressing it, you cannot fit more water into water. Therefore, water is saturated with itself. Therefore, it is soaked. Therefore, it is wet.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoWater can’t absorb neither moisture nor water so it can’t be holding as much of either as can be absorbed.
I would say this still works.
Assuming we are not compressing it, you cannot fit more water into water. Therefore, water is saturated with itself. Therefore, it is soaked. Therefore, it is wet.
Water can’t absorb neither moisture nor water so it can’t be holding as much of either as can be absorbed.