• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’m not sure what the author was expecting Carney to say. The Prime Minister is not exactly likely to be cheering political violence of any sort, and he still has to deal with Trump after this news cycle moves on. “Violence bad, thoughts and prayers to the family” is about as close as he can come to “I really don’t give a shit that that douche nozzle bit it”.

    • the_q@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That’s the rub. No one in a position of power or influence having the stones to say the truth is a big fucking problem.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        What “truth”? Do you consider escalating political violence to be a good thing? That may be a valid opinion, but it’s far from a verifiable truth. In the case of a leader of a country, whether or not it’s a “truth” matters even less. Let’s say Carney says exactly whatever it is you want him to say. Great. What does that gain the Canadian people? It will for sure antagonize Trump, so what’s that cost? Do the gains outweigh the costs?

        • the_q@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Is it just how things are now that people pull whatever they want from a comment? I’m not talking about praising violence, I’m talking about saying that Kirk was a Nazi and he died because another Nazi adjacent moron didn’t like the particular brand of hate he was spewing. He wasn’t a good husband and father or a man just expressing his opinion freely; he was a hate and fear monger. Antagonizing Trump should be the point. But I guess you canucks are just as cowardly as most Americans.

          • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Canada doesn’t have the power (or really the responsibility) to deal with Trump. The Americans have to get their shit together and do that themselves. Antagonizing Trump is fine if it gains us something. In this case, it would gain us nothing, and likely cost us in the future. Doing self destructive things just for hollow “victories” that feel good is how Trump got into power in the first place. I have no interest in following that strategy.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Definitely an option. Best guess is they put out a generic statement like this to short circuit any media questions about it, and to take some wind out of Poillievre’s sails if he decides to go grandstanding about it.

  • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The amount of people who didn’t look into this and feel offended by the House applauding a monster should really watch the video on parlvu.ca to see why they have egg on their face.