• logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Doesn’t a terrorist have to target an actual group of people? You know, because the “terror” part of “terrorism” is the fear from others that their life is in danger.

    What group was he targeting? Rich people? CEOs of bottom-of-the-barrel healthcare companies who cause death and suffering for profit? These don’t seem like the right kind of group to qualify as terrorism.

    Click for list of people who have downvoted this comment

    cookedonchems@lemmy.zip

  • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    They’ll probably still get him on murder charges. As long as they can link him to doing the act itself, he’s not getting away from those consequences without jury nullification or a damn good escape plan.

    • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s gonna be hard to link him to the murder when the chain of custody is the shitshow it is. He didn’t do it, they planted the evidence on him and fucked up the planting.

    • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No. Luigi is facing the death penalty from the federal case which he currently has to defend against simultaneously, though his lawyers are continuing to push for one of the cases to be dismissed under double jeopardy laws.

      The dismissal of the terrorism charges was for the case trial in the New York state courts. While New York has not had a death penalty since 2004, the dismissal of the terrorism charges means that life without parole is off the table.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Double jeopardy argument is DOA. I don’t like it, but long standing Supreme Court precedent says you can face both state and federal charges for the same crime. Unless they have some weird trick, that argument is just an attempt that’s barely worth trying.

  • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This was the state terrorism charges right? At least I thought it was. Honestly NY charges are the least scary. If rather the feds stay out of it though. It happened in NY. NY should be the judge.