YES YOU COLOSSAL FUCKING CLOWN! I’m defending the right of enbies to present how they want to fucking present! I don’t care if they look like a damn power lifter, a genderless Fae being, or a goddamned Victoria’s Secret model, the only “requirement” to be nonbinary is to IDENTIFY AS NONBINARY!!
Edit: To elaborate for others who might come later “Female-lite” is a reductive term that means that nonbinary is essentially just “person that I can perceive as woman, but is trying to distance from the baggage of misogyny” while “female heavy” refers to just “presenting too much like a woman” in this case. One is an actual erasure of identity by way of saying oh you’re basically women in all but name, the other is trying to police someone’s gender presentation because it’s not androgynous enough for you.
Ah yes, because that is the takeaway from “defending the right of enbies to present how they want to present,” and “female/woman lite” has totally never been used to erase and other any nonbinary person who isn’t a thin white androgynous AFAB person. Oh that’s not nonbinary, they’re too masculine/feminine. That’s a gay man, that’s a trans woman in denial, that’s <insert anything but nonbinary here>.
So you admit you’ve been twisting words this entire time in a desperate attempt to be right? Fuck all the way off you miserable little gremlin. Fuck out of here trying to say oh now I’m arguing your side you fucking clown.
My first reply was “feels like enby erasure” … your last reply before this one was talking about enby erasure from the same point of view.
If you’ve got tied up like a pretzel over this, that’s your problem … as I said earlier, I lashed out and that was unreasonable of me. Now you’re the one being unreasonable - I’ll have you know I’m not a “miserable little gremlin”. I’m actually quite large.
YES YOU COLOSSAL FUCKING CLOWN! I’m defending the right of enbies to present how they want to fucking present! I don’t care if they look like a damn power lifter, a genderless Fae being, or a goddamned Victoria’s Secret model, the only “requirement” to be nonbinary is to IDENTIFY AS NONBINARY!!
Edit: To elaborate for others who might come later “Female-lite” is a reductive term that means that nonbinary is essentially just “person that I can perceive as woman, but is trying to distance from the baggage of misogyny” while “female heavy” refers to just “presenting too much like a woman” in this case. One is an actual erasure of identity by way of saying oh you’re basically women in all but name, the other is trying to police someone’s gender presentation because it’s not androgynous enough for you.
So you’re not defending the rights of “female-light” enbies, just everyone else.
Ah yes, because that is the takeaway from “defending the right of enbies to present how they want to present,” and “female/woman lite” has totally never been used to erase and other any nonbinary person who isn’t a thin white androgynous AFAB person. Oh that’s not nonbinary, they’re too masculine/feminine. That’s a gay man, that’s a trans woman in denial, that’s <insert anything but nonbinary here>.
So now you’re arguing on my side. Thank you, I was beginning to think you’d never understand where I was coming from
So you admit you’ve been twisting words this entire time in a desperate attempt to be right? Fuck all the way off you miserable little gremlin. Fuck out of here trying to say oh now I’m arguing your side you fucking clown.
My first reply was “feels like enby erasure” … your last reply before this one was talking about enby erasure from the same point of view.
If you’ve got tied up like a pretzel over this, that’s your problem … as I said earlier, I lashed out and that was unreasonable of me. Now you’re the one being unreasonable - I’ll have you know I’m not a “miserable little gremlin”. I’m actually quite large.