• Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    There wasn’t consent though. It can be spun that way, but biblically Mary was destined to carry, and screw any free will.

    • Epp4@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Mormons took that and really ran with it, as their a “Doctrine & Covenants” are much more blatant in support of rape. Joseph Smith told Emma Hale that God would destroy her for refusing to marry him.

      • Cruel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        How do they support rape? Or do you consider it rape of I tell I woman she’ll go to hell if she doesn’t consent?

        • Epp4@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Because in D&C 132:54, Emma is threatened with destruction if she refuses. That’s called rape by duress.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yes. it can absolutely be spun that way, as I said. As most anything in the Bible can be. Let me ask this then. Could she have said no? And when would that have happened?

        • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.” Then the angel left her.

          It’s in Luke chapter 1. I mean a lot of people believe believe none of it happened, whatever. But consent was part of the account.

          • Epp4@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            That was AFTER impregnation, though, and under duress from supernatural beings. I don’t think that’s the correct order of operations for valid consent…

            • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              No, the angel was telling her what was going to happen. It was speaking in future tense, and she agreed while talking to the angel.

              34 “How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?”

              35 The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. 36 Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be unable to conceive is in her sixth month. 37 For no word from God will ever fail.”

              38 “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.” Then the angel left her.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I guess it’s consent. The master/deity or their aide comes to the servant and tells them of master’s will, the great plan. The servant says, yeah, okay.

            Yet another fail in writing. Why not make it so God and Gabriel give her the choice, and she adamantly agrees? Remove all doubt from the story’s plot. Or better yet, add some drama, have Mary unsure, and Gabriel explains the importance (not that it’s already planned, but why her choice is key to the direction of salvation and all that). And she with some thought decides to do it.

            Oh, right… that would give a woman some agency. Never mind.