• Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Pedophilia has always been a part of Christianity. Mary was 13 when she gave birth to Jesus. Joesph was in his 70s. It’s the basis of the religion. At least Christianity tries to hide it by pretending that she was virgin and her child was actually from god. That’s better than, say, islam, where mohammad just outright marries Aisha when was 6 years old and pretended that allah told him its halal.

  • udon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Check out poor Lot whose evil daughters plot to get him drunk so they can rape him. The poor old man, I’m sure there was no redaction going on in post production.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The Republican party is not a monolith guys, it’s made up of several distinct groups such as child rapists and child rapist enablers.

  • FunkyCheese@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Tbh theres pedophilia and incest in the bible already

    But sometimes it depends on the translation (and language)

  • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    No need, it’s already part of it and has been for centuries.

    Remember how the Catholic church raped kids and protected pedophiles? It’s not just Catholicism.

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Numbers 31:17-18 KJV

    Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

    • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      So, if I understood right, they groom them for when they are adults? That’s…little better.

      You are still grooming a child just for sex.

    • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Numbers is good but for the very best ultra-violence I suggest Deuteronomy

      Deut. 21:18-21

      18 If someone has a stubborn and rebellious son who does not obey his father and mother and will not listen to them when they discipline him, 19 his father and mother shall take hold of him and bring him to the elders at the gate of his town. 20 They shall say to the elders, “This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a glutton and a drunkard.” 21 Then all the men of his town are to stone him to death.

  • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Have you read the Bible? Harems, concubines, child brides, slavery, women shouldn’t speak, etc…

    • Deacon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As a former evangelical Christian I can assure you that any average one of them can only be said to have read the bible in the same way that I could be said to have read my favorite cook book. If that.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        Ok, so what is the current canon?

        I don’t think the new testament includes child diddling, but I didn’t read much of that either.

        Probably because I lost faith quite some time ago.

        • Deacon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          Well, as I see it, evangelical Christianity has just about totally morphed into Christian Nationalism by now, and the canon for Christian Nationalism seems to essentially be Trump’s Truth Social feed.

          • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 minutes ago

            Oof, how can someone be so mindless, that they will go against basic human decency to do whatever leader tells them?

            Proof that philosophical zombies are real.

      • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That’s insightful, thank you.

        As someone who did read the full book years ago when going to school and remembers fuckall in it except how repetitive and boring the Old Testament was, this helps me understand their approach of picking and choosing scripture.

  • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 hours ago

    At first I though this wasn’t a shitpost.

    Then I thought shitposts have evolved into what would previously have been called cutting, brilliant satire. Then I thought that fascists killed satire, and this is just straight-up news.

    Finally I realized this is indeed a shitpost and should have just thought “Yeah, heh.” And be done with it.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Well God can use ‘imperfect people’. Just look at King David.”

    How that story actually went…


    David: Has an affair with Bathsheba and has her husband assassinated.

    God: “Listen here you little shit. I gave you everything you could ever want and you decided that wasn’t enough. I’m feeling merciful so I won’t kill you like you killed Uriah. Instead, you can spend the rest of your miserable life suffering the consequences of your evil deeds.”

    • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Yes, instead he tortures David’s innocent child to death for a week for David’s crime. And no punishment at all for the 200 philistine foreskins or any other of David’s immoral behaviour

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Old enough to be considered a woman, but culturally it could have been as young as 16.

      When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. In a loud voice she exclaimed: “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear! (Luke 1:41-42)

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There wasn’t consent though. It can be spun that way, but biblically Mary was destined to carry, and screw any free will.

        • Epp4@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          Mormons took that and really ran with it, as their a “Doctrine & Covenants” are much more blatant in support of rape. Joseph Smith told Emma Hale that God would destroy her for refusing to marry him.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yes. it can absolutely be spun that way, as I said. As most anything in the Bible can be. Let me ask this then. Could she have said no? And when would that have happened?

            • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.” Then the angel left her.

              It’s in Luke chapter 1. I mean a lot of people believe believe none of it happened, whatever. But consent was part of the account.

              • Epp4@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 minutes ago

                That was AFTER impregnation, though, and under duress from supernatural beings. I don’t think that’s the correct order of operations for valid consent…

              • Rhaedas@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I guess it’s consent. The master/deity or their aide comes to the servant and tells them of master’s will, the great plan. The servant says, yeah, okay.

                Yet another fail in writing. Why not make it so God and Gabriel give her the choice, and she adamantly agrees? Remove all doubt from the story’s plot. Or better yet, add some drama, have Mary unsure, and Gabriel explains the importance (not that it’s already planned, but why her choice is key to the direction of salvation and all that). And she with some thought decides to do it.

                Oh, right… that would give a woman some agency. Never mind.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          however it is a misconception that people married and had kids young in the past. generally it was in your early 20s even in antiquity

        • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          She was called a woman by her cousin who was so old that John the Baptist’s birth was miraculous. She could have been older, not all women married young. But to be considered a woman she wouldn’t have been 13.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure pedofilia is a problem in most religions. That’s why I choose no religion