• Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Severity (trump):

    How many allegations were made against Trump?

    1? 2? Countless?

    How many felony convictions did Trump have?

    1? 2? 34?

    Did Trump have clear connections to known sex trafficker epstein?

    Yes.

    Severity (biden):

    Were there any allegations made against Biden?

    No

    Has biden ever been convicted of a felony?

    No

    Did biden have any connection to any known sex trafficker?

    No

    See how Im doing all the hard thinking for you? See how Im actually weighing facts?

    Try it sometime.

    • Goodeye8@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Really living up to that republican brain. Please read again what I asked.

      please do a breakdown of your rule and explain how you get severity instead of bias.

      Seems I need to spell it out what that means. This entire comment tree is about whether the title of your post makes sense or not. I’m claiming it doesn’t make sense because if you apply it objectively to all the presidential candidates it makes it very easy to dismiss a candidate because only questioning is enough to consider someone unfit. You’re arguing it makes sense because of “severity”. You do not use that word in your title and I don’t see a single instance of anything indicating anything about “severity”. For your argument to make any sense you need to explain how severity is derived from your title. If you add severity after the fact then that just proves the original title didn’t make sense.

      • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Sorry, its obvious to me you dont understand context or how language is used. Its a two sentence title, not a thesis. Please, figure your shit out.