• CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    You know, I think I’d be okay with that. As long as it’s not something that’s begging for your attention or trying to get you to click on it.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or loading at random intervals so you have to scroll around to find where you were before the page jumped around. Very little infuriates me more.

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I could almost live with ads if they were static, but the typical article-reading experience without afblock goes like this:

        See the first paragraph. Start reading. An autoplay video pops in at the top of the page obscuring the view. You scroll down but it’s pinned to the top of the viewport. You close it with the miniscule x button. You finish the first paragraph and scroll down past a huge ad to the next paragraph. A banner ad appears at the bottom of the page. You dismiss it with the x. You start reading and two seconds later the banner you dismissed reappears with a new ad, obscuring the content again. You try to dismiss it, but miss and open the ad. Press back in the browser and start again from step 1.

        Its exhausting, and it’s so painfully constrained, like trying to view a webpage by peeking at it through someone’s letterbox.

        The Internet with ads, as it stands, is not worth seeing.

        • fishy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not to mention it greatly lowered the quality of content. Now it’s 95% getting a catchy clickbate title with the actual body often not even agreeing with the title. It’s fucking exhausting.