Documents released by the Justice Department briefly mention a woman’s unverified accusation that Donald J. Trump assaulted her in the 1980s, when she was a minor. But several memos related to her account are not in the files.

NPR also showed that a lot of pages are missing

    • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Yep, I’m looking. Starts with your snide comment that says:

      I’m sure Kamala’s DOJ would have covered this up, too, amirite?

        • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Ah sure you got me. Your names are similar at a glance. Doesn’t change the fact that you’re reply is just apologist bullshit.

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Ah sure you got me.

            It wasn’t a trick question, lol.

            Your names are similar at a glance.

            Well, they do have some alphabetical symbols in common. I can see how that threw you.

            Doesn’t change the fact that you’re reply is just apologist bullshit.

            At this point that’s pretty rich, but I can see how you’re reduced to ad hominem. It’s not like you have anything else, or ever did. If being told to heed the dates and read the articles more closely got your panties in a twist, god help you with reality. Bye.

            • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Heed what dates? The ones that place the evidence firmly in existence for the entirety of Biden’s term?

              • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                Your comments indicate you don’t have any idea what they found, or when, or what it means. For you to assert anything about evidence at all is ludicrous. You didn’t even get my name right. You couldn’t even tell, even after being prompted, that I was not OP. But you’re an expert on evidence.

                But I will give you credit for this: you are indeed an expert in demonstrating how someone tries desperately to elide the difference between fact and opinion, and what disinformation looks like in the real world, delivered with a dose of rage and trust me bro facts you pull out of your ass. And all anyone has to do is read the articles to know it.

                • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  What facts have I pulled out of my ass? You think a few missing files that the article is talking about excuse the lack of action on the entire case?

                  I’m not talking about these specific files, I’m talking about the whole thing. Which we can all see with our own eyes right now. You don’t need to trust me on anything, if you assert that the Biden administration did its job on this case, you need to prove that.

                  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 hours ago

                    I’m not talking about these specific files, I’m talking about the whole thing.

                    Lol, okay. I never left the subject of the articles, which you have clearly never read and/or are unable to parse anyway.

                    if you assert that the Biden administration did its job on this case, you need to prove that.

                    Okay, so quote me asserting that.

                    And this time try to quote me, not someone else. Good luck with that, on both counts.

                    But what I’m really waiting for is even a fraction of your rage against Biden, who is not mentioned once, to appear against Trump, who is mentioned over 38,000 times.

                    Your ire against Biden knows no bounds, to the point you don’t even know who you’re quoting; you seemed incoherent with rage.

                    But your ire against Trump – not only a pedophile but directing the coverup – is nonexistent.

                    Don’t think that goes without notice.

                    EDITED to add link