LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agoIndeedpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up1966arrow-down19
arrow-up1957arrow-down1imageIndeedpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square73linkfedilink
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down8·20 hours agoIt’s fun whacking a straw man, but “I don’t agree with X” doesn’t mean “X doesn’t exist”, it means “I don’t believe people should engage in X”. If someone says “I don’t agree with pushing your religious beliefs on others”, would you reply the same way?
minus-squareCXORA@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·edit-218 hours agoYou understand that’s different right? How are you going to complain about a strawman and then use one of your own? Homosexuality isnt an action its a characteristic. “I dont agree with recycling” is different than “i dont agree with being left handed”.
minus-squareRagingRobot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 hours agoI’m ok with being gay and I’m ok with being left-handed but I don’t believe anyone could be left-handed and gay. They absolutely should not be recycling in that condition. We need to draw the line somewhere
It’s fun whacking a straw man, but “I don’t agree with X” doesn’t mean “X doesn’t exist”, it means “I don’t believe people should engage in X”.
If someone says “I don’t agree with pushing your religious beliefs on others”, would you reply the same way?
You understand that’s different right?
How are you going to complain about a strawman and then use one of your own?
Homosexuality isnt an action its a characteristic. “I dont agree with recycling” is different than “i dont agree with being left handed”.
I’m ok with being gay and I’m ok with being left-handed but I don’t believe anyone could be left-handed and gay. They absolutely should not be recycling in that condition. We need to draw the line somewhere