In a sensational turn of events in the fight against Chat Control, a majority in the European Parliament voted today to end the untargeted mass scanning of private communications. In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years. Pressure is now mounting on EU governments to respect the MEPs’ vote and bury untargeted mass surveillance in Europe once and for all.

  • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I wonder what all these anti-EU russian propaganda bots are going to use now to sow discontent against the EU… lol

  • greenbit@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Europe has pressure to shift the narrative from all systems and institutes have been a part of the parasite class goals, to these concessions. “Noo don’t collapse us, we are less rigged”. But rigged is still rigged

  • Drew1718@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Doesn’t mean anything yet. Parliament can get overruled by the Council, whom seem more in favor of untargeted scanning.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Finally some good fucking news. Now let’s make it so there’s no 2.0 3.0 etc constantly trying to sneak this in - we need to enshrine privacy into real laws.

  • lb_o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Good News! I was so afraid for our future in Europe.

    Losing freedoms in our modern times will lead to just another authoritarian state, which will eventually lead to shit.

  • ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 hours ago

    In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years.

    Good news. However shouldn’t that also include online age verification?

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Everything is temporary.

      Political participation is a full-time job, keep the pressure on and the change will endure.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Awesome

    Can we now put that in some form of European constitution, pretty please with a cherry?

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yay Europe! Genuinely happy for you folks.

    Maybe someday we’ll have freedom and privacy in the US :’)

    • Tim@lemmy.snowgoons.ro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s definitely starting to feel like having your rights enshrined on unalterable tablets of stone, but which must be re-interpreted by a half dozen political appointees holding a seance with the founding fathers every few months, may not be the platonic ideal of governance that Americans are constantly telling the world it is.

    • Big Baby Thor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Halt! You have gone below the mandatory threshold for nationally mandated jingoism. An ICE unit has been dispatched to your location to bring you to the RFK Right-To-Labour camp.

      The beating will continue until moral improves.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Shit, I’ve heard so much gear mongoring about this for so long. Also on here.

    The EU’s stance have never been anything other than no chat control. All everyone else have pointed out are proposals not even reaching the votes, or got voted down.

    I get that you are afraid that the EU would do it anyway and pass the proposals. But they never did, and even if it got voted for today, it’s not even final and needs to go to the council who is openly against it.

    But so nice that this is FINALLY put down.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      This is a really naive take - this amendment (which requires message scanning to be targeted) passed with a slim majority and could well have failed. In that case the existing mass surveillance (“voluntary scanning”) would probably keep happening at least until 2028.

      The council meanwhile is overwhelmingly pro-message-scanning, and they (together with the commission) are the ones who are pushing to break e2e encryption. There will now be talks between the three institutions to decide on how to proceed. Sadly I expect that some “compromise” will be reached eventually.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Says the guy overlooking the other trojan horse of age controls being brought inside the walls. Your analysis is not so good.

      • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That “trojan horse” is nothing but a paper tiger since age control will be managed in a completely privacy-friendly way. It is a non-issue. So that is why it is being “overlooked”

        The check will send nothing more than a yes/no verification, and no other forms of identification.

        And the information will be managed by a governmental institute that already has all that information.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Jesus christ, you are a mark for some con artist with your naivety, no offense bro. Ha.

          • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            If you can’t understand the technology behind it, please refrain from calling other people names. It makes you look ignorant.

            The EU is very privacy focused, as should be apparent with the post you are literally commenting on.

            Your russian propaganda holds no power here. It didn’t work with chat control, and it won’t work with age verification either.

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 minutes ago

              gtfo. We all know what age control is in reality. You are playing us, for the oligarchy. Admit it!

    • It’s always better to be worried for nothing than not worried for something you didn’t pay enough attention to. Even if something fascist has no chance of passing, you should still resist it as loudly and as aggressively as possible, every single time.

  • Jiral@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The war over civil rights is continuing, no questions but this has been an important vote against the surveillance state ambitions.