• nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

    • Art3mis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Im a centrist, i think billionaires should have their wealth liquidated and socialized. You know, instead of murdering them in the streets and letting those that want to eat them…

      • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Not sure if this is missing a /s, but my suggestion is an opening salvo, not the end goal.

        Further, I’m not an advocate for anyone to eat shit. The rich should be mulched as a form of resource recycling.

        • Art3mis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          yes “compost the rich” has always been my preferred go to as well. Its more feasible and waaaaay healthier. For us.

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I think they are joking that redistributing their wealth and abolishing billionaires is centrist. Or rather, should be, and that murdering them all is the slightly more radical alternative.

          And honestly, yeah, why is it acceptable, at all, for a few select individuals to have such massive fucking amounts of wealth, and not just that, but have that be like… the “medium”/centrist opinion? That’s completely absurd. It should be in the realm of neofeudalism or neomonarchism. A far far right wing joke of an opinion.

  • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d be willing to run a science experiment where we eliminate those people and redistribute the wealth to the people, to determine its impacts on society. For science!

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Until we change the things that allow them to accumulate that wealth it won’t do much. Just make things a small bit easier for a bit until they suck it back up again

      • pilferjinx@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        We are in dire need of another soft reset though. There just isn’t enough room to maneuver change with the stranglehold they currently have.

        • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I feel like this is sort of the collective problem humanity has. As soon as we do that reset, people will just say “🤷‍♂️ things are good now so why do we need to focus on changing anything? oh look this politician’s offering me a tax break

          Edit: that being said I would kill for a soft reset anyway

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most of the wealth is stocks. How would distribution stock, yachts, mansions going to help everyone?

      • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Stocks are easy to disperse. Non liquid assets can be repurposed for public benefit. The yacht is now a passenger ferry. The mansion is homeless housing. Etc etc

        • krisevol@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That would do literally nothing for the people. That would help like .000001% of Americans, and who would pay for the upkeep?

        • krisevol@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          So you think everyone sounds get a piece of profits and the government runs the company’s?

          • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            There would not longer be a concept of “profits” in this system but sort of yeah? A state made up of workers who democratically determine what should be produced and to what extent based on the known needs and capabilities of the population within the context of the long term consequences of production would be a good thing. The government wouldn’t “own companies” because the idea of a company would not exist. A percentage of the value produced by each worker would be theirs and the rest would go to social services instead of their employers personal wealth.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    8.6 Billion people

    0.001% is 86,000 people

    Average volume of a person is 0.1m^3

    Compacted into a flesh cube, that is 860m^3. Each edge of the flesh cube would be 283m long (928 ft or 2.5 football fields)

    The more you know.

  • chosensilence@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    i mean, it is lol. this is a true statement if you remove “capitalism” from the concept of pursuing profit above all else. that isn’t just capitalism but it is a primary way to execute it. mercantilism and feudalism practically laid the groundwork for capitalism, so the concept of malicious greed existed way before.

    most social problems can be traced back to the pursuit of wealth, yes.

  • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Half the people in the world have zero wealth (which is bad let’s continue to help with this), but anyone who has a twenty in their pocket, no car, no mortgage, and their credit card paid off has more wealth than half the population.