• toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d be willing to run a science experiment where we eliminate those people and redistribute the wealth to the people, to determine its impacts on society. For science!

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Until we change the things that allow them to accumulate that wealth it won’t do much. Just make things a small bit easier for a bit until they suck it back up again

      • pilferjinx@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        We are in dire need of another soft reset though. There just isn’t enough room to maneuver change with the stranglehold they currently have.

        • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I feel like this is sort of the collective problem humanity has. As soon as we do that reset, people will just say “🤷‍♂️ things are good now so why do we need to focus on changing anything? oh look this politician’s offering me a tax break

          Edit: that being said I would kill for a soft reset anyway

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most of the wealth is stocks. How would distribution stock, yachts, mansions going to help everyone?

      • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Stocks are easy to disperse. Non liquid assets can be repurposed for public benefit. The yacht is now a passenger ferry. The mansion is homeless housing. Etc etc

        • krisevol@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          That would do literally nothing for the people. That would help like .000001% of Americans, and who would pay for the upkeep?

        • krisevol@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          So you think everyone sounds get a piece of profits and the government runs the company’s?

          • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            There would not longer be a concept of “profits” in this system but sort of yeah? A state made up of workers who democratically determine what should be produced and to what extent based on the known needs and capabilities of the population within the context of the long term consequences of production would be a good thing. The government wouldn’t “own companies” because the idea of a company would not exist. A percentage of the value produced by each worker would be theirs and the rest would go to social services instead of their employers personal wealth.