• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    That is a first tiny step towards the citizens owning their means of production. Now pass some protection laws so we can keep the greedy unions out and keep the costs fairly low.

    • hoserhobbes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You seriously think high grocery costs are due to unions? How are you both pro-communism and anti-union?

      • maplesaga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Its an interesting question, obviously a union would raise prices of goods. Which prevents poor people working in things like nail salons from affording food as easily, as the unionized grocer becomes a highly coveted position which gatekeeps food from the people that cant get hired there due to demand.

        • hoserhobbes@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          In an idyllic world where no capitalist greed is focused on maximizing shareholder value that might be a more significant concern. But in modern day, a union raising their wages by 10% might result in less than a 1% increase in user prices. Whereas the ruling class of capitalists are the true source of greedflation making products unaffordable.

          If anything in your example I would argue that the better solution is actually more unions. Those nail salon workers should also earn living wages to afford the goods, which unions would fight for. I would be shocked to learn of any case where a union could be compared to the average elite-class capitalist in terms of greed.

          • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Playing with numbers while the stark reality of societal decay dances all around you. I can’t blame you for being an idealist though. Being an idealist gives you standards to shoot for, and that is beneficial.