Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 16 hours agoSlop detectives be like rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up1731arrow-down13
arrow-up1728arrow-down1imageSlop detectives be like rulelemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square52linkfedilink
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 hours agoThe problem is it’s not plagiarism detector (it would also be a pretty bad one since it can’t detect quotes) it’s an AI detector. It’s saying that a direct quote is AI, Which obviously isn’t true, it’s a quote, which is a different thing. If 10% of my thesis is quoting other works that’s not the same as my thesis being 10% AI generated. The distinction needs to be made.
The problem is it’s not plagiarism detector (it would also be a pretty bad one since it can’t detect quotes) it’s an AI detector.
It’s saying that a direct quote is AI, Which obviously isn’t true, it’s a quote, which is a different thing.
If 10% of my thesis is quoting other works that’s not the same as my thesis being 10% AI generated. The distinction needs to be made.