He stood by her and supported her. He is complicit.
It’s easy to accept that but then it’s not far fetched to think that
everybody who keeps doing his job in the US or EU is guilty of supporting the war in Iran.
Ehhh, that’s a slippery slope argument and kind of farfetched. Dude chooses who he is married to for years. People don’t choose where they are born, and a general strike/sabotage is more difficult than not choosing to marry a dog killing MAGA conservative and staying to marry them while they try their hardest to make people’s lives as difficult as possible.
He has a bimboification kink, that doesn’t make him trans and acting like it does is hurtful to the trans community. Trans women are not bimboified men.
I didn’t say he probably killed a dog. I said he actively supported a dog-killing, family-breaking, hatred filled monster of a woman. That makes him a peice of shit.
Do…do you not support the person you are married to? What a ludicrous question. Are you or have you ever been in a romantic relationship before? Mutual support is, like, the basic fundamental principle.
I seriously can’t get over what a strange question that is. Like an alien who has only heard of humanity before.
What a strange question to ask what he’s done to be mocked for crossdressing?
I’ve been in relationships before. That doesn’t mean I cosign everything my partner does.
And, I don’t know, maybe a wild hunch, but maybe they are estranged and married in name only? Maybe she’s taken a wild turn recently? I don’t know their personal life.
I’m not even defending Byron. He probably is a piece of shit. But he’s not a public person as far as I know and hasn’t done anything wrong that I know of. And no one in this thread has listed a single thing he’s done wrong other than being married to a reprehensible person.
So I don’t think he’s fair game for mockery at all, and especially not for crossdressing, especially not for things done in private, and especially not by purportedly tollerant people until I hear he’s done something wrong, not just been around someone who has.
You can feel however you want. My conscience is clear.
Are partners in abusive relationships complicit in and supportive of their own abuse?
Can you conceive of being in a relationship without actively supporting everything your partner does?
Do you think the wives and husbands of murderers are morally deficient if they don’t divorce their spouses in jail?
For that matter, do you think Kristi Noem’s justification of killing the dog is so impossible that her husband could not possibly believe it to have been reasonable?
This guilt-by-association is ugly and wrong. Some corners of the internet fetishise cutting off all contact with people the moment they transgress, but most people are in fact more forgiving than that, and so should they be.
Has he done something wrong or are we hounding him when he hasn’t hurt anybody?
His wife hurt a bunch of people and shot a dog.
So, no.
He stood by her and supported her. He is complicit.
It’s easy to accept that but then it’s not far fetched to think that everybody who keeps doing his job in the US or EU is guilty of supporting the war in Iran.
Ehhh, that’s a slippery slope argument and kind of farfetched. Dude chooses who he is married to for years. People don’t choose where they are born, and a general strike/sabotage is more difficult than not choosing to marry a dog killing MAGA conservative and staying to marry them while they try their hardest to make people’s lives as difficult as possible.
Does he?
Would that make Melinda French/Gates a probable pedophile?
It makes them complicit, yes.
Alrighty, then. Let’s continue mocking a likely trans person on the day of trans visibility for the crime of being married to Kristi Noem.
Though the vibe from the comments is that their crime is being trans.
Mocking for hypocrisy isn’t the same as mocking for who they are… Other than being a hypocrite.
What did Byron do that’s hypocritical?
He has a bimboification kink, that doesn’t make him trans and acting like it does is hurtful to the trans community. Trans women are not bimboified men.
“Eva Braun was a strong, independent woman”
This is what you sound like.
So mock her for being female, then? What a bizarre line of reasoning.
Anyways, don’t let me get in your way.
You’re the problem with lemmy.
I didn’t say he probably killed a dog. I said he actively supported a dog-killing, family-breaking, hatred filled monster of a woman. That makes him a peice of shit.
How did he support her?
Do…do you not support the person you are married to? What a ludicrous question. Are you or have you ever been in a romantic relationship before? Mutual support is, like, the basic fundamental principle.
I seriously can’t get over what a strange question that is. Like an alien who has only heard of humanity before.
What a strange question to ask what he’s done to be mocked for crossdressing?
I’ve been in relationships before. That doesn’t mean I cosign everything my partner does.
And, I don’t know, maybe a wild hunch, but maybe they are estranged and married in name only? Maybe she’s taken a wild turn recently? I don’t know their personal life.
I’m not even defending Byron. He probably is a piece of shit. But he’s not a public person as far as I know and hasn’t done anything wrong that I know of. And no one in this thread has listed a single thing he’s done wrong other than being married to a reprehensible person.
So I don’t think he’s fair game for mockery at all, and especially not for crossdressing, especially not for things done in private, and especially not by purportedly tollerant people until I hear he’s done something wrong, not just been around someone who has.
You can feel however you want. My conscience is clear.
Are partners in abusive relationships complicit in and supportive of their own abuse?
Can you conceive of being in a relationship without actively supporting everything your partner does?
Do you think the wives and husbands of murderers are morally deficient if they don’t divorce their spouses in jail?
For that matter, do you think Kristi Noem’s justification of killing the dog is so impossible that her husband could not possibly believe it to have been reasonable?
This guilt-by-association is ugly and wrong. Some corners of the internet fetishise cutting off all contact with people the moment they transgress, but most people are in fact more forgiving than that, and so should they be.
You’re asking how he supports the woman he chooses to stay married to?
Are you daft? Or do you love ICE that much?
My grandmother didn’t divorce my alcoholic grandfather. Are you saying she supported his alcoholism?
He was apparently okay with all of this as they are still married and he never said anything about it. So, yeah
deleted by creator