Jo Miran@lemmy.mlM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agoYOU SHOULD KNOW RULElemmy.mlimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1522arrow-down12
arrow-up1520arrow-down1imageYOU SHOULD KNOW RULElemmy.mlJo Miran@lemmy.mlM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square55linkfedilink
minus-squarecenzorrll@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·2 days agoThe cordless phone was a 900MHz radio, not processor.
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-22 days agoAnd it was a 80486 model CPU. Probably at 25MHz.
minus-squareatomicbocks@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoI have a 486 DX4 that runs at 100mhz. It was faster than the contemporary Pentium that ran at 80mhz. Though this was one of the last 486s and later Pentiums hit higher speeds.
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoI had that one too! It had a 25MHz bus and the processor quadrupled that to 100MHz in its turbo mode: hence the 4 in DX4. Either way, it certainly wasn’t a 486MHz CPU ;-)
The cordless phone was a 900MHz radio, not processor.
And it was a 80486 model CPU. Probably at 25MHz.
I have a 486 DX4 that runs at 100mhz. It was faster than the contemporary Pentium that ran at 80mhz. Though this was one of the last 486s and later Pentiums hit higher speeds.
I had that one too!
It had a 25MHz bus and the processor quadrupled that to 100MHz in its turbo mode: hence the 4 in DX4.
Either way, it certainly wasn’t a 486MHz CPU ;-)