• neatchee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    I see. So if our ideal candidate isn’t possible anymore for the next election, we should always vote for the worse candidate, to drive people further towards public outcry, until civil unrest can get the real goal accomplished.

    Makes perfect sense

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      we should always vote for the worse candidate,

      The point is that it doesn’t matter who you vote for, and pretending otherwise is a bit absurd. All we get are neoconservative politics no matter who we elect. The difference is one side pretends to be powerless and just lets the bad shit happen. (Except for genocide and poverty, which they enthusiastically aid and support.)

      Your only power is local unless you’re willing to commit a dramatic act of vigilantism.

      • neatchee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        You may wish there were a third track, but taking your hand off the lever gives up power.

        Saying it doesn’t matter is a naive position of privilege. Of course it matters. This is a “they’re no different” argument that is just so obviously a false equivalence.

        • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          but taking your hand off the lever gives up power.

          You’re saying that voters should have no power and have to accept whatever the Democrats nominate. You don’t seem to understand what power is.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      No, not being allowed to rewrite history doesn’t mean that at all. You don’t get to erase the incredible violence faced by average people that was ultimately behind the passage of the VRA, or the cowardice of the politicians who wouldn’t act until the mob was literally on their doorstep.

      If you think anything I’ve said about the VRA is inaccurate you need to go read a history book. Anyone telling you to be grateful to the Democrats for passing it out of the goodness of their heart is at minimum too ignorant about the actual history of the US to listen to, or they’re trying to con you.