That’s not how language works. Language isn’t as systematic as you seem to assume. The meme is being inclusive, distancing from LGB groups by explicitly mentioning trans
(colloquial, sometimes derogatory) Homosexual. [from 19th c.]
(colloquial, sometimes derogatory) Non-heterosexual or non-cisgender: homosexual, bisexual, asexual, transgender, etc.
(loosely) Pertaining to sexual or gender behaviour or identity which does not conform to conventional heterosexual or cisgender norms, assumptions etc. [from 20th c.]
(dated) Strange, odd or different; whimsical. [from 16th c.]
(…)
Sooooo this is implying trans != queer? lol
Completely unrelated but I misread your instance name as “redhat.com” at first
That’s not how language works. Language isn’t as systematic as you seem to assume. The meme is being inclusive, distancing from LGB groups by explicitly mentioning trans
I think the meme is just trying to be inclusive
From Wiktionary:
(…)
It is already inclusive.
It depends on how you define queer.
Again, I think the intent of the post is positive and inclusive. It’s ok if we just take it at face value.
You learn a lot about a toad when you dissect it but it dies in the process