• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Be honest. Even if every single data centre did that, would it worse enough to really change the picture? It’s still going to be less than paper production by a long way for a long while.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You’re fighting a losing battle here, some people just have decided that AI is bad no matter what. There are quite many here on lemmy, which is a shame because there are good and bad sides about AI, but IMO it for sure is here to stay, so discussions would be interesting, again IMO.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yep, I’ve not had a productive discussion about it that I remember. It’s not just that people have made their minds up; they also will not hear anything that is misaligned with their belief, even if ultimately compatible: you don’t need to think that ai is useful or good to realise its energy use is not especially important. But if it’s bad everything about it must be bad.

      • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        AI is bad, but it’s bizarre to point to its energy usage, out of all things. It’s really missing the forest for the trees. As top commenter’s data shows, even gaming on a gaming PC is so much worse (considering a 650W PSU, which is 6.5 times the TV example).