• protist@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    “People can be peer pressured into both lethal dueling and sex, therefore they’re equivalent” is not a valid argument.

    And even if such willingness were a sign in and of itself that someone isn’t clear-headed, would it make more sense to ban the practice than to offer proper mental care and general material support to people considering it?

    Do you think we should make suicide illegal?

    Again, lethal dueling and suicide are not equivalent. Someone deciding for themselves that they’re going to end their own life…if it’s something they’ve thought about and planned (as opposed to an impulsive attemps, which are 95% of actual suicides), there’s no realistic way to stop it. Dueling involves killing someone else , my man.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.netBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      “People can be peer pressured into both lethal dueling and sex, therefore they’re equivalent” is not a valid argument.

      That’s not what I’m saying. what I’m saying is that the possibility of peer pressure is not a valid argument for banning it.

      That it should be legal is the null hypothesis, which must be overturned by arguments that demonstrate that criminalizing it makes society better before we can determine that its illegality is just.

      Again, lethal dueling and suicide are not equivalent. Someone deciding for themselves that they’re going to end their own life…if it’s something they’ve thought about and planned (as opposed to an impulsive attemps, which are 95% of actual suicides), there’s no realistic way to stop it.

      If two people decide to duel each other in private in a place of their own choosing, why would there be any more chance of stopping them?

      And even if you’re talking about punishing people afterward, so many murders go unsolved, imagine how hard it gets if the person who dies fully cooperates with preparing an alibi and a means of disposal and removing any real evidence.

      Dueling involves killing someone else

      With their consent. Do you oppose euthanasia?

      , my man.

      Incorrect.

      • protist@retrofed.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        That it should be legal is the null hypothesis, which must be overturned by arguments that demonstrate that criminalizing it makes society better before we can determine that its illegality is just.

        Fortunately, there are extensive bodies of work on the morality and legality of dueling, since it was a pretty common activity in the US between the Revolution and the Civil War. Don’t take my word for it. Do a little research, my woman.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.netBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          So on matters of consent, the authorities you choose to cite are slave owners, misogynists, and homophobes?

          Is there even one author among the sources you pictured who would have supported my right to exist as an atheist bisexual emancipated trans woman?

          • protist@retrofed.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Is there even one author among the sources you pictured

            Uhhh…what sources did I picture? There are literally hundreds, maybe thousands of sources on this, and I urged you to look into it

            • Tiresia@slrpnk.netBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              That would make what I ask of you particularly easy, then.