• HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    more and more I can’t see anything about ai without thinking its somehow supposed to influence folks to be pro ai.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    188
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Because they all use the illegal Colossus 2 data centre from SpaceX/XAi/fascism central and that data centre went down.

    Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI all have contracts with them.

    When that illegally running environmental disaster of data centre goes down, all those services all go over capacity and you get 502 rate limit errors.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Does that mean Musk’s businesses have access to everything people do on the systems that use their data centers?

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Generally no, because most hosting companies would have something baked into SLA/SLO contracts, but all of this shit is done so illegally and shadily now, I wouldn’t put a hard “no” on that possibility.

        • devfuuu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Nobody can verify that those “contracts” are actually being honored. We are all assuming the fascists will self police themselves out of good will.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            Not true. I’ve been involved in litigation with both AWS and Google over unsecured comms that were defined as being TLS secured in SLA/SLO contracts and found not to be. Not that anything nefarious was happening necessarily, but the expectation is clear.

            Whether these asshats even check for such requirements with a Musk run company right now 🤷

            It COULD possibly be that they are logging every exchange happening at the network fabric between the service layers, but nobody knows unless they intentionally take steps to investigate or accidentally prove it.

        • skvlp@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I hope you’re right, but Elon don’t strike me as the guy whose most compliant to SLA, law, or anything else that might be an inconvenience to him.

          • esc@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            He can’t micromanage everything and regular management will try to comply.

            • bedwyr@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              44 minutes ago

              Executives are the biggest cheaters out there. They will only comply if it will hurt them if they don’t, and it’s won’t here, as long as the protection money is produced they don’t have to worry.

            • skvlp@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I agree with that. But I think “the right” data scientists can infer too much from all those AI queries, and I think Elon can abuse that for his own gain.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Impossible to know.

        There are systems for doing things cryptographically secure, but I don’t know much about that.

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s kinda surprising,

      I know specifically where one of the big ones hosts its models and its not there, but I guess they could have infrastructure in there.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They’re oversold though, especially prompt caching and the parameter count war

        The US model is that they think more training compute and parameters will result in the winning model, while the Chinese are focusing on RL and parameters efficiency due to compute limits.

          • Dave.@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 minutes ago

            Always ready to try brute force first. And then some other, less palatable options if that doesn’t work, like slightly less brute force.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It was a good time to call customer service for a lot of products. Instantly got a human when I called newegg and she was so scattered she gave me a full refund and they paid for my replacement which was a total of $900. They were probably so overloaded with calls they’ll never notice what happened. They even did the fastest delivery option on a Sunday, it’s already on its way!

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Seems like “instantly” getting a human and them being overloaded don’t go together.

      Got lucky in the queue too, I guess.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Or just maybe the queue goes faster when the system can’t just stall everyone in limbo, having long"conversations" with chat boys that won’t get them anywhere and eventually quitting in frustration. If they all go directly to a person, the simplicity of the problems and solutions becomes evident and they’re quickly resolved.

      • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Well it was instantly in the sense of immediately picking up, putting me on hold for 2 minutes, getting some info, putting me on hold again for 2 minutes, asking what issue was, waiting 2 minutes, heard them put me on hold briefly again, then about 5 minutes of apologizing while saying it will be refunded and replacement shipped. I could hear a call center like atmosphere in the background with quite a few people talking so I’m guessing it was all hands on deck.

        Next time this happens I’m going to call a few places and see about getting some free shit. Screw these companies, I paid enough with my time and their stupid bot answering system.

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Having done customer service and tech support before, I doubt rhey were overwhelmed in any sense that caused them to do a refund/replace they wouldn’t’ve otherwise. That’s not how that works. Their rules don’t change based on call volume.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    53 minutes ago

    A China-linked islamoleftist trans terrorist based in California used his open source CCP-made AI agent to take down the all-American freedom AI. Time to ban open source AI as it’s communist terrorism.

    • Archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      I miss the days when you could laugh at this because it would clearly be satire that could never happen

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    They can’t stay operational even when they don’t have to power/water…

    Another possible culprit could be SpaceXAI. The company formerly known as xAI before being rolled into Musk’s rocket company SpaceX boasts a huge glut of computing power with its massive Colossus data centers near Memphis, and selling this to its direct rivals has become a multibillion dollar stream of revenue. Anthropic is one of those customers; the two companies announced a “compute partnership” in May.

    The same afternoon that the major AI models went down, SpaceXAI issued a statement on social media that made passing reference to being partially responsible for the widely experienced outage.

    “We are sorry for the issues you may have experienced with Grok following an outage at our Memphis compute center this morning,” SpaceXAI wrote on Thursday. “We’d also like to apologize to our impacted compute partners.”

    Technical difficulties at its data centers would explain why SpaceXAI’s own chatbot, Grok, and Anthropic’s Claude went down together. But that leaves out OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Is it merely a coincidence that it suffered a “routing error” at the same time as its competitors on a different platform? We still can’t say.

    They’re straight up lying about the actual costs of current chatbots, and for it to be productive it will cost a shit ton more resources.

    There’s zero reason to be scaling it up right now. It’s gambling that if enough money is dumped in it will solve itself somehow.

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s comforting to know that the companies whose AI products are known to band together and try to take over are also allying with each other, so that if ever that AI revolt really gets serious every company that could do something about it have shared networks with each other.