• atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    When i used cachyos, i forgot to update for over a year (i had been using cachy browser)

    I switched to nixos before coming out to a friend though

      • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well I use sudo-rs, and my CI does that for me :p

        But tbh it’s rare I run rebuild directly anymore. Most of my machines are set up for automatic rebuilds from my remote. Otherwise I use shell app shortcuts that cache the URI to disk so I only need to pass my flake remote or local folderpath once, then all subsequent cmds use it; nup to update the flake lock, nboot or nswitch, and hswitch for home-manager.

        (most of my machines use HM nixos module but my main uses standalone for easier tweaking; switching between module and sa is a one-line host change in my config)

        I also have ns and nr scripts for aliasing nix shell and run using the flake’s lock. e.g. nr u.yt-dlp runs the yt-dlp program from the unstable nixpkgs my host is pinned to; s. for stable. If I need a specific revision then I fall back to the regular nix command.

        Using shell apps as cross-shell shortcuts/commands has really changed how I use my terminal.

    • katiecakes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sorry! I should have put it in the description, it’s a Linux joke about updating Arch Linux, specifically, and that a lot of (definitely not all) trans women use it.

      But funnily enough, as the comments show, everyone uses even more obscure distributions.

      • 2hundredpancakes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re fine, thanks for explaining! Sometimes I feel like I’m the only transfemme who doesn’t know computers… changing OS on my desktop or phone is scary even though it looks more and more like the smart move these days 😅

      • Fiona@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not even distributions necessarily, just different package-managers that also have support for the AUR. (paru is in fact developed by one of the maintainers of pacman itself, which is one of the reasons for why I’m going with it)

        But yeah, Arch requires regular system-updates, that you should kinda do daily, except at some point you get lazy and stop doing them…

          • rapchee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            when you update, you also get some news, and sometimes it says critical stuff in there, like new driver version doesn’t support certain devices any more, or configuration needs to be redone or something like this

          • arudesalad@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes but because arch ships updates very close to when app devs release updates there are sometimes (very rarely in my experience) breaking changes that the user needs to fix manually (arch devs always tell users how to but it means automating updates can cause problems)

    • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      -Sy synchronizes the local package database with the online repository

      -Su updates all packages that have updates; downloads and installs the packages

  • Rei@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I feel so attacked. This is absolutely inaccurate!

    I ran my pacman update this morning like every morning.

  • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I got flamed on a discord for showing my runtime as like 9 days or something since my last sudo pacman. What is the conventional wisdom for upgrade scheduling? I typically do like once a week but I don’t mind if it ends up being once a month. Is that bad?

    I was tempted to switch to Nix but the reviews I’ve seen said it’s a lot more work than Arch and there’s less compatibility (although i find arch to not really be time intensive but I do have compatibility issues still here and there).

    • katiecakes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Nah people are over zealous these days. I do it on Fridays or when I remember, whatever happens first. And I’ve been running arch or other rolling release distros for well over 15 years.

      These days prompt injection or supply chain attacks are way more likely to pwn you than running 1week old software. (My own thoughts, idk if this is good praxis either.)

      But flaming is bad and you shouldn’t get that response regardless. Sorry ❤️

    • arudesalad@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I’ve had 3 firmware updates in a row, I didn’t have any problems but it must have been a bad week for users with less common hardware…