Gormadt@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 20 hours agoGorillaz Based of Course [Rule]slrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1753arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1747arrow-down1external-linkGorillaz Based of Course [Rule]slrpnk.netGormadt@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square48linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down10·15 hours ago Now you tell him why he’s wrong. he’s wrong because he’s edgy, and the discussion on his points have been done for centuries by better people than me.
minus-squarevzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·15 hours agoYou know, you can just say “I refuse to engage with your obvious rage bait”. But he’s not wrong because he’s edgy. He’s wrong because he’s wrong. Or not. As the case might be.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·15 hours agobut I don’t want to not engage with obvious rage bait. I want to humiliate rage baiters
minus-squareAzuranAurora@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·15 hours agoYou’re only humiliating yourself.
![Gorillaz Based of Course [Rule]](https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/5a959005-1f02-40b2-b5f2-f55691ef753c.png){kind=link}
he’s wrong because he’s edgy, and the discussion on his points have been done for centuries by better people than me.
You know, you can just say “I refuse to engage with your obvious rage bait”.
But he’s not wrong because he’s edgy. He’s wrong because he’s wrong. Or not. As the case might be.
but I don’t want to not engage with obvious rage bait.
I want to humiliate rage baiters
You’re only humiliating yourself.